Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.4K
Human Crowds as Social Networks: Collective Dynamics of Consensus and Polarization
William H Warren1, J Benjamin Falandays1, Kei Yoshida1
1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University.
Summary
Collective behavior in crowds and opinion formation share similar self-organized dynamics. Models of crowd dynamics and opinion dynamics can be unified under a common collective dynamics framework.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Network Science
- Computational Social Science
Background:
- Collective behavior, such as coordinated motion in bird flocks and fish schools, emerges from local interactions without central control.
- Similar phenomena like consensus, clustering, and bipolarization are observed in human crowd dynamics and social network opinion formation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To draw parallels between human crowd dynamics and opinion dynamics in social networks.
- To demonstrate the mathematical similarities and analogous phenomena generated by models of crowd and opinion dynamics.
- To propose a unified framework of collective dynamics applicable to various psychological collectives.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of crowd networks and development of crowd dynamics models.
- Comparison of crowd dynamics models with existing opinion dynamics models in social networks.
- Multiagent simulations to observe emergent phenomena in both domains.
Main Results:
- Crowd dynamics and opinion dynamics models exhibit similar mathematical structures.
- Both types of models generate analogous collective behaviors, including consensus, clustering, and bipolarization.
- The study highlights the self-organized nature of decision-making in both crowds and social networks.
Conclusions:
- Human crowd behavior and social network opinion formation can be unified by a common collective dynamics.
- This unified model offers a way to understand collective decision-making without assuming pre-existing mental structures.
- The findings suggest broader applicability to other psychological collectives.
Keywords:
action/performancecollective behaviorcollective decision-makingcrowd dynamicsopinion dynamicsperceptionsocial cognitionMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Social Traps
22.4K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.4K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Social Exchange Theory
34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K

