Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
Published on: March 9, 2015
The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices
Claire A J van den Eeden1,2, Christianne J de Poot1,2,3, Peter J van Koppen2
1Research, Knowledge & Development Department, Police Academy of the Netherlands, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
A large body of research has described the influence of context information on forensic decision-making. In this study, we examined the effect of context information on the search for and selection of traces by students (N = 36) and crime scene investigators (N = 58). Participants investigated an ambiguous mock crime scene and received prior information indicating suicide, a violent death or no information. Participants described their impression of the scene and wrote down which traces they wanted to secure. Results showed that context information impacted first impression of the scene and crime scene behavior, namely number of traces secured. Participants in the murder condition secured most traces. Furthermore, the students secured more crime-related traces. Students were more confident in their first impression. This study does not indicate that experts outperform novices. We therefore argue for proper training on cognitive processes as an integral part of all forensic education.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Correspondence Bias
Self-Serving Bias
Motivational Bias

