Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Band Theory02:35

Band Theory

17.3K
When two or more atoms come together to form a molecule, their atomic orbitals combine and molecular orbitals of distinct energies result. In a solid, there are a large number of atoms, and therefore a large number of atomic orbitals that may be combined into molecular orbitals. These groups of molecular orbitals are so closely placed together to form continuous regions of energies, known as the bands.
The energy difference between these bands is known as the band gap.
Conductor, Semiconductor,...
17.3K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

89.3K
Scientific Laws
89.3K
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.8K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.8K
The Atomic Theory of Matter02:59

The Atomic Theory of Matter

129.6K
The earliest recorded discussion of the basic structure of matter comes from ancient Greek philosophers. Leucippus and Democritus argued that all matter was composed of small, finite particles that they called atomos, meaning “indivisible.” Later, Aristotle and others came to the conclusion that matter consisted of various combinations of the four “elements” — fire, earth, air, and water — and could be infinitely divided. Interestingly, these philosophers...
129.6K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Molecular Orbital Theory II03:51

Molecular Orbital Theory II

27.7K
Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams
27.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural cues for symmetry, asymmetry, and non-symmetry in Central Taurus Sign Language.

Sign language and linguistics·2024
Same author

The Parallel Architecture in Language and Elsewhere.

Topics in cognitive science·2023
Same author

A parallel architecture perspective on pre-activation and prediction in language processing.

Cognition·2022
Same author

Relational Morphology: A Cousin of Construction Grammar.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same author

Multiword Constructions in the Grammar.

Topics in cognitive science·2017
Same author

Linear grammar as a possible stepping-stone in the evolution of language.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
10:43

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity

Published on: July 1, 2014

15.8K

Morphology and Memory: Toward an Integrated Theory.

Ray Jackendoff1,2, Jenny Audring3

  • 1Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University.

Topics in Cognitive Science
|May 18, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study reframes linguistic theory by viewing grammar rules as lexical items with variables. This approach reveals a highly structured lexicon and suggests similar cognitive patterns across domains.

Keywords:
LexiconMemoryMorphologyWords and rules

More Related Videos

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.1K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
10:43

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity

Published on: July 1, 2014

15.8K
A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.1K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Traditional linguistic theory divides knowledge into grammar (rules) and lexicon (exceptions).
  • This division presents limitations in understanding memory storage and representation.
  • An alternative framework is needed to capture the complex structure of linguistic knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative view of linguistic theory where grammar rules are lexical items containing variables.
  • To explore the dual generative and relational functions of these lexicalized rules.
  • To investigate the potential for similar representational structures in other cognitive domains.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual modeling of linguistic knowledge representation.
  • Analysis of traditional generative linguistics frameworks.
  • Comparative exploration of representational structures across cognitive domains.

Main Results:

  • Grammar rules are proposed as lexical items with variables, possessing generative and relational functions.
  • This model results in a highly structured lexicon with emergent patterns.
  • Evidence suggests similar organizational principles may apply to knowledge representation in other domains.

Conclusions:

  • A unified view of grammar and lexicon, where rules are variable-containing lexical items, offers a more integrated model of linguistic knowledge.
  • The relational function of rules is crucial for uncovering lexicon structure.
  • The proposed representational framework may extend beyond language to other cognitive areas like music and social knowledge.