Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Effect of Low Back Pain Risk-Stratification Strategy on Patient Outcomes and Care Processes: the MATCH Randomized
Dan Cherkin1, Benjamin Balderson2, Rob Wellman2
1Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. cherkin.d@ghc.org.
The STarT Back strategy, adapted for the US, did not improve patient function or reduce healthcare costs for low back pain. Clinicians used the tool but did not alter treatment recommendations, leading to no significant patient outcome changes.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Musculoskeletal Disorders
Background:
- The STarT Back strategy, a risk-stratification approach for low back pain (LBP), has shown promise in improving patient function and reducing costs in England.
- Implementing this strategy in a US healthcare setting required adaptation and evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of an adapted STarT Back strategy for managing non-specific low back pain in a US primary care setting.
- To assess the impact of the intervention on patient function, pain severity, and healthcare utilization.
Main Methods:
- A pragmatic cluster randomized trial involving six primary care clinics, with three randomized to the STarT Back intervention and three as controls.
- Adult patients with non-specific LBP were followed for 6 months, with data collected at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months post-visit.
- The intervention included training for primary care clinicians and physical therapists on the STarT Back Tool and its integration into electronic health records.
Main Results:
- Clinicians utilized the STarT Back Tool for approximately half of the patients but did not modify their treatment recommendations based on the risk stratification.
- The intervention demonstrated no statistically significant effect on primary outcomes, including back-related physical function and pain severity, at 2 or 6 months.
- Secondary outcomes, such as healthcare utilization, also showed no significant difference between the intervention and control groups.
Conclusions:
- A resource-intensive implementation of the STarT Back strategy in a US primary care setting did not yield improvements in patient outcomes or healthcare use.
- The findings suggest that adaptation and training alone may not be sufficient to translate the benefits of the STarT Back strategy observed in other settings to the US healthcare context.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Continuing Care
Standards of Care I
Ostomy Care
An ostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an artificial opening from the intestines to the outside of the body, allowing for the rerouting of effluent. This opening is known as a stoma. A stoma usually protrudes above the skin surface, appearing pink or red, moist, and round, and it lacks nerve sensations.
There are different types of ostomies, including colostomies, ileostomies, and urostomies:

