Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tissue and mechanical valves: mutually advantageous interplay.

A Starr1, G L Grunkemeier, C L Fessler

  • 1Heart Institute, St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon.

Journal of Cardiac Surgery
|September 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementation of an automated, real-time mortality prediction tool in trauma patients: Can it do more than just predict mortality?

Injury·2025
Same author

Clinical and radiographic predictors for angiography in pelvic trauma: An analysis of 1703 patients.

Injury·2024
Same author

Publisher Correction: Indo-Pacific Walker circulation drove Pleistocene African aridification.

Nature·2022
Same author

Indo-Pacific Walker circulation drove Pleistocene African aridification.

Nature·2021
Same author

Validating the GTP-cyclohydrolase 1-feedback regulatory complex as a therapeutic target using biophysical and in vivo approaches.

British journal of pharmacology·2015
Same author

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY.

A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
Same journal

Erratum.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Validity of direct bilateral axillary arterial cannulation in emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Evaluation of midterm outcomes after Shone's complex surgery: Analysis of reoperation and mortality risk factors.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Subannular procedures on papillary muscles for secondary mitral valve regurgitation repair.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
Same journal

Safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin after cardiac surgery.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
Same journal

Impact of rapid rehabilitation surgery on perioperative nursing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
See all related articles

Choosing between bioprosthetic (tissue) and mechanical heart valves depends on patient factors. These valve types offer distinct advantages, suggesting a complementary approach for optimal patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Prosthetic Devices

Background:

  • Heart valve replacement involves choosing between mechanical and bioprosthetic (glutaraldehyde-preserved tissue) devices.
  • Each valve type presents unique advantages and disadvantages.
  • Current practices may not fully leverage the complementary nature of these prostheses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the dynamic interplay between mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves.
  • To advocate for a tailored selection approach based on patient-specific factors.
  • To improve overall outcomes in heart valve replacement surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of glutaraldehyde-preserved tissue valves and mechanical valves.
  • Evaluation of patient selection criteria, including age and anticoagulation safety.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the complementary roles of different valve prostheses.

    • Main Results:

    • Mechanical and bioprosthetic valves are not directly competitive but offer non-overlapping benefits.
    • Proper patient selection can optimize the use of each valve type.
    • A combined approach, matching valves to patients, yields superior results compared to a single-device strategy.

    Conclusions:

    • Mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves should be viewed as complementary, not competitive.
    • Tailoring valve selection to individual patient characteristics (e.g., age, anticoagulation tolerance) is crucial.
    • Optimizing prosthesis-patient matching enhances overall outcomes for both mechanical and bioprosthetic valve recipients.