Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

08:29
Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
15.2K
Clinical Consensus Strategies to Repair Ruptures in the Therapeutic Alliance
Catherine F Eubanks1, Lisa A Burckell1, Marvin R Goldfried1
1Stony Brook University.
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
|May 29, 2018
Summary
Therapists should validate client experiences and explore ruptures during sessions. Change-oriented interventions are best used in future sessions, not during the rupture itself, to improve therapeutic alliance.
Area of Science:
- Psychotherapy Research
- Clinical Psychology
- Therapeutic Alliance Studies
Background:
- The therapeutic alliance is a key predictor of treatment outcomes.
- Understanding how to repair alliance ruptures is crucial for effective therapy.
- Integrating research findings into clinical practice remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To achieve expert consensus on effective strategies for repairing alliance ruptures.
- To bridge the gap between research on therapeutic alliances and clinical practice.
- To identify therapist-validated techniques for managing ruptures.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Expert Consensus Guideline Series methodology.
- Collected clinical situations describing alliance ruptures from 69 therapists.
- Identified and rated the effectiveness of clinical strategies proposed by 177 therapists, with 134 experts providing ratings.
Main Results:
- Experts reached consensus on validating client experiences and exploring ruptures during the rupture event.
- Change-oriented interventions were deemed less effective during ruptures but beneficial for subsequent sessions.
- Consensus highlighted the importance of addressing ruptures in real-time.
Conclusions:
- Findings support the use of alliance-focused interventions during ruptures.
- Therapist awareness of the alliance state is critical for identifying and addressing ruptures.
- Expert consensus provides practical guidance for managing therapeutic ruptures.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
43.7K
Overview
43.7K
Mismatch Repair
6.7K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
6.7K
Overview of DNA Repair
33.8K
In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
Chemically...
33.8K
Base Excision Repair
26.4K
One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
The first step of...
26.4K
Nucleotide Excision Repair
40.9K
Overview
40.9K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
8.0K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
8.0K

