Acupressure in Psychotherapy as an Unsinkable Rubber Duck: A reply to

In a recent publication entitled "Integrating the Manual Stimulation of Acupuncture Points Into Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review with Clinical Recommendations," appearing in this journal, Feinstein (2023) aims to aggregate the evidence on Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) across the "hierarchy of evidence." EFT is based on the premise that tapping facilitates alterations in "energy meridians" and that these alterations reduce psychological symptoms or disorders. This commentary addresses several concerns with the Feinstein (2023) review including the pseudoscientific concept of energy meridians, the lack of evidence that tapping on acupressure points is the active ingredient that resolves psychological disorders, serious methodological flaws with EFT research, and the incompatibility of EFT with the ethical practice of psychology. Thus, we disagree with Feinstein's (2023) conclusion that "The body of research on acupoint tapping that has emerged over the past two decades and the increasing quality of the study designs appears promising" (p. 61) and instead argue that EFT represents a pseudoscientific, "unsinkable rubber duck" (i.e., a belief that people continue to hold despite evidence to the contrary).