Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
Published on: May 11, 2020
[Biomechanical study of a newly-designed Y type pedicle screw in osteoporotic synthetic bone]
Tengyu Wang1, Jiajun Chen1, Xin Zhou1
1Department of Orthopedics, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Yongchuan Chongqing, 402160, P.R.China.
Objective:
To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a newly-designed Y type pedicle screw (YPS) in osteoporotic synthetic bone.
Methods:
The osteoporotic synthetic bone were randomly divided into 3 groups ( n=20). A pilot hole, 3.0 mm in diameter and 30.0 mm in deep, was prepared in these bones with the same method. The YPS, expansive pedicle screw (EPS), and bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw (CICPS) were inserted into these synthetic bone through the pilot hole prepared. X-ray film examination was performed after 12 hours; the biomechanical stability of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was tested by the universal testing machine (E10000). The test items included the maximum axial pullout force, the maximum running torque, and the maximum periodical anti-bending.
Results:
X-ray examination showed that in YPS group, the main screw and the core pin were wrapped around the polyurethane material, the core pin was formed from the lower 1/3 of the main screw and formed an angle of 15° with the main screw, and the lowest point of the inserted middle core pin was positioned at the same level with the main screw; in EPS group, the tip of EPS expanded markedly and formed a claw-like structure; in CICPS group, the bone cement was mainly distributed in the front of the screw and was dispersed in the trabecular bone to form a stable screw-bone cement-trabecular complex. The maximum axial pullout force of YPS, EPS, and CICPS groups was (98.43±8.26), (77.41±11.41), and (186.43±23.23) N, respectively; the maximum running torque was (1.42±0.33), (0.96±0.37), and (2.27±0.39) N/m, respectively; and the maximum periodical anti-bending was (67.49±3.02), (66.03±2.88), and (143.48±4.73) N, respectively. The above indexes in CICPS group were significantly higher than those in YPS group and EPS group ( P<0.05); the maximum axial pullout force and the maximum running torque in YPS group were significantly higher than those in EPS group ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the maximum periodical anti-bending between YPS group and EPS group ( P>0.05).
Conclusion:
Compared with EPS, YPS can effectively enhance the maximum axial pullout force and maximum rotation force in the module, which provides a new idea for the design of screws and the choice of different fixation methods under the condition of osteoporosis.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Screw: Problem Solving
To evaluate the...
Self-Locking Screw
A square-threaded screw jack carrying a load is considered self-locking if the screw retains its position even after the moment applied to it is removed.
Frictional Forces on Screws
A jack with a square-threaded screw is a mechanical device used to lift heavy loads by applying a force at its handle. When the force is applied, the screw turns, raising the load. The screw can...
Group Design

