Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

High-Throughput Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence and Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy Using a Photonic Chip
Published on: November 16, 2019
[Development and current situation of reconstruction methods following total sacrectomy]
Siyi Huang1, Tao Ji1, Wei Guo2
1Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P.R.China.
Reconstructing after total sacrectomy is challenging. Combining spinopelvic fixation (SPF), posterior pelvic ring fixation (PPRF), and anterior spinal column fixation (ASCF) improves stability, but biological fixation needs further research.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic reconstruction
- Biomechanical engineering
Background:
- Total sacrectomy presents significant reconstruction challenges.
- Advancements in fixation techniques are crucial for restoring stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolution of reconstruction methods after total sacrectomy.
- To guide the selection of optimal reconstruction strategies.
Main Methods:
- Literature search of case reports and biomechanical/finite element studies.
- Summarization of developmental trends and current reconstruction approaches.
Main Results:
- Significant progress in reconstruction concepts and fixation techniques over 30 years.
- Three primary fixation strategies identified: spinopelvic fixation (SPF), posterior pelvic ring fixation (PPRF), and anterior spinal column fixation (ASCF).
- SPF evolved from intrapelvic rods to screw-rod systems; PPRF and ASCF enhance stability.
Conclusions:
- Reconstruction after total sacrectomy remains complex.
- Combining SPF, PPRF, and ASCF is key for mechanical stability.
- Achieving long-term stability through biological fixation is a critical future challenge.
Related Concept Videos
Development of Analytical Methods
Electrical Current
Sustainable Development
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation
Total Voids in Concrete
Current Density

