Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Stereotactically-guided Ablation of the Rat Auditory Cortex, and Localization of the Lesion in the Brain
Published on: October 11, 2017
Variability and bias between magnetoencephalography systems in non-invasive localization of the primary somatosensory
Timothy Bardouille1, Lindsey Power2, Marc Lalancette3
1Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, 6310 Coburg Road, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada; Biomedical Translational Imaging Centre (BIOTIC), IWK Health Centre, 5980 University Street, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Room 319, Victoria Building, 1276 South Park St, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Objectives:
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides functional neuroimaging data for pre-surgical planning in patients with epilepsy or brain tumour. For mapping the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), MEG data are acquired while a patient undergoes median nerve stimulation (MNS) to localize components of the somatosensory evoked field (SEF). In clinical settings, only one MEG imaging session is usually possible due to limited resources. As such, it is important to have an a priori estimate of the expected variability in localization. Variability in S1 localization between mapping sessions using the same MEG system has been previously measured as 8 mm. There are different types of MEG systems available with varied hardware and software, and it is not known how using a different MEG system will impact on S1 localization.
Patients And Methods:
In our study, healthy participants underwent the MNS procedure with two different MEG systems (Vector View and CTF). We compared the location, amplitude and latency of SEF components between data from each system to quantify variability and bias between MEG systems.
Results:
We found 8-11 mm variability in S1 localization between the two MEG systems, and no evidence for a systematic bias in location, amplitude or latency between the two systems.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that S1 localization is not biased by the type of MEG system used, and that differences between the two systems are not a major contributor to variability in localization.
More Related Videos
07:04Imaging Neural Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Using Thy1-GCaMP6s Transgenic Mice
Published on: January 7, 2019
10:22Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy
Published on: December 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex
Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence of...
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...