Scar burden, not intraventricular conduction delay pattern, is associated with outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy
Evan C Adelstein1, Andrew D Althouse1, David Schwartzman1
1Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Insights
Patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) show less benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to those with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Scar burden, not QRS pattern, independently predicts adverse outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients receiving CRT-defibrillators.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) is associated with poorer outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to left bundle branch block (LBBB).
- Understanding the factors contributing to these outcome disparities is crucial for optimizing CRT in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether differences in post-CRT outcomes between ICM patients with LBBB and IVCD are linked to intrinsic QRS patterns or myocardial scar burden.
- To identify the independent predictors of CRT response and clinical outcomes in ICM patients with varying QRS morphologies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 393 consecutive ICM patients with LVEF ≤35% and QRS duration >120 ms, categorized by LBBB or IVCD.
- Assessment of myocardial scar burden using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and comparison of QRS duration, LVEF changes, and clinical outcomes (death, transplant, VAD, appropriate shocks).
- Multivariable analyses were employed to determine the relative contributions of QRS pattern and scar burden to patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- Patients with IVCD exhibited greater scar burden and narrower baseline QRS duration than LBBB patients.
- IVCD patients showed less QRS narrowing post-CRT and less LVEF improvement compared to LBBB patients.
- Myocardial scar burden, not QRS morphology or duration, was independently associated with LVEF increase and improved long-term clinical outcomes (survival, reduced need for VAD/transplant, fewer appropriate shocks).
Conclusions:
- In ICM patients receiving CRT-defibrillators, IVCD is linked to higher myocardial scar burden compared to LBBB.
- Myocardial scar burden, rather than the specific QRS pattern (LBBB vs. IVCD), is the independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes.
Background:
Patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) benefit less from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB).
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether post-CRT outcome differences in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) relate to intrinsic QRS pattern and/or scar burden.
Methods:
We analyzed 393 consecutive ICM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, QRS duration >120 ms, and LBBB or nonspecific IVCD who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and CRT-defibrillator implant. We compared scar burden; QRS duration; LVEF change; risk of death, transplant, or ventricular assist device; and risk of appropriate device shocks between LBBB and IVCD patients, using multivariable analyses to determine relative associations between QRS pattern vs scar burden and outcomes.
Results:
Nonspecific IVCD is associated with greater scar burden and narrower baseline QRS duration than LBBB. IVCD patients demonstrated less QRS narrowing with CRT than LBBB patients, even when excluding IVCD patients with QRS duration <150 ms. LVEF improved less in patients with IVCD vs LBBB, but only scar burden not QRS morphology or duration was associated with LVEF increase ≥5%. During 39-month follow-up, IVCD was associated with shorter survival free from transplant/ventricular assist device and shorter time to first appropriate device shock. Scar burden but not QRS morphology was independently associated with these outcomes on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion:
IVCD is associated with greater scar burden than LBBB in ICM CRT-defibrillator recipients. Scar burden, not QRS pattern, is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:16Isolation and Characterization of Cardiac Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Endomyocardial Bioptic Samples of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Patients
Published on: February 28, 2018
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
