Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Auditory Ossicles01:11

The Auditory Ossicles

3.2K
The auditory ossicles of the middle ear transmit sounds from the air as vibrations to the fluid-filled cochlea. The auditory ossicles consist of two malleus (hammer) bones, two incus (anvil) bones, and two stapes (stirrups), one on each side. These bones develop during the fetal stage and are the ones to ossify first. They are fully mature at birth and do not grow afterward.
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...
3.2K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.1K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.1K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

7.4K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
7.4K
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins02:18

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

19.6K
Intrinsically disordered proteins are a group of proteins that do not fold into specific three-dimensional structures. Their structural flexibility allows them to complement ordered proteins to perform functions that are inaccessible to rigid structures. They are more common in eukaryotes than prokaryotes and may either be exclusively intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins, consisting of a mix of ordered and disordered regions. The absence of a rigid structure in these proteins can be...
19.6K
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

317
Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
317
Bone Disorders01:29

Bone Disorders

5.4K
Aging and its effect on bone remodeling is the most common cause of bone disorders. In young and healthy people, bone deposition and resorption happen at an equal rate to maintain optimal bone health.
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
5.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parent's Satisfaction of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Iran.

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India·2022
Same author

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hearing Loss in Neonates Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Hospital Study.

Cureus·2020
Same author

Risk Factors for Otitis Media in Children Referred to Abuzar Hospital in Ahvaz: A Case-Control Study.

Cureus·2020
Same author

The Correlation Analysis Between the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Psychophysical Measurement of Spatial Hearing.

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India·2019
Same author

Development of the Farsi Hearing in Noise Test.

International journal of audiology·2019
Same author

Binaural Interaction Component of Middle Latency Response in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.3K

Dichotic training in children with auditory processing disorder.

Maryam Delphi1, Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi2

  • 1Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
|June 4, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Dichotic Offset Training (DOT) and Differential Interaural Intensity Difference (DIID) both improve auditory processing disorder (APD). DOT requires fewer sessions than DIID for similar results.

Keywords:
Auditory processingAuditory trainingDichotic listening

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.2K
Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

11.3K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.2K
Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) diagnosis often involves dichotic listening tests.
  • Abnormal ear asymmetry, typically a right ear advantage, can indicate APD.
  • Differential Interaural Intensity Difference (DIID) and Dichotic Offset Training (DOT) are key interventions for dichotic listening deficits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of DIID and DOT training in addressing dichotic listening disorders.
  • To evaluate which training method offers a more efficient resolution of APD-related listening challenges.

Main Methods:

  • Twelve children aged 8-9 years with APD and abnormal right ear advantage participated.
  • Participants were randomly assigned to either DIID or DOT training groups (6 per group).
  • Training efficacy was assessed based on performance improvements in dichotic listening tasks.

Main Results:

  • Both DIID and DOT training demonstrated significant improvements in dichotic listening.
  • DOT training required fewer sessions (12.83) compared to DIID training (21.16) for comparable performance gains.
  • A statistically significant difference was observed in the length of treatment required between the two methods (P≤0.001).

Conclusions:

  • DOT training may serve as a viable alternative to DIID, particularly when DIID is not feasible.
  • Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to generalize these findings.
  • The study suggests DOT is a more time-efficient intervention for improving dichotic listening in children with APD.