Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rafaella de Souza Leão1, Juliana Raposo Souto Maior1, Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos2
1Universidade de Pernambuco - UPE, Dentistry School, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Abstract:
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, "Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?" A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54-1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57-4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37-2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.
Insights
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) offers complication rates comparable to autologous bone and titanium mesh for cranioplasty. This systematic review found no significant differences in complication rates between PMMA and other materials, supporting its use.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Engineering
Background:
- Cranioplasty is a surgical procedure to repair skull defects.
- Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is a commonly used material, but its complication profile requires comparison.
- No definitive consensus exists on the optimal material for cranioplasty regarding complication minimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze complication rates of PMMA versus autologous bone and titanium mesh in cranioplasty.
- To determine if PMMA prostheses exhibit similar complication rates to autologous bone and titanium mesh.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science.
- Meta-analysis of complication rates from 11 eligible studies involving 1,256 patients and 1,278 cranioplasties.
- Comparison of risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in complication rates between PMMA and autologous bone (RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54-1.75; p=0.94).
- No significant difference in complication rates between PMMA and titanium mesh (RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57-4.48; p=0.38).
- Sub-analysis based on craniotomy reason (trauma/non-trauma) showed no significant difference (RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37-2.42; p=0.91).
Conclusions:
- PMMA demonstrates complication rates comparable to autologous bone and titanium mesh for cranioplasty.
- PMMA is a viable option for cranioplasty, with similar safety profiles to established materials.
- Further research may refine optimal material selection based on specific patient factors and defect types.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
