Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reproducibility - A Journal Editor's Perspective.

David Drubin

    Anatomical Record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)
    |June 15, 2018
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Reproducibility in scientific research is a significant issue, with studies showing only 12%-25% success rates in replicating preclinical findings. This talk addresses the scope of the reproducibility problem and potential journal solutions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Multimodal Adaptive Optical Microscope For <i>In Vivo</i> Imaging from Molecules to Organisms.

    bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
    Same author

    Fourier-Based 3D Multistage Transformer for Aberration Correction in Multicellular Specimens.

    Research square·2025
    Same author

    Differential Effector Engagement by Oncogenic KRAS.

    Cell reports·2018
    Same author

    MBoC celebrates its first 20 years.

    Molecular biology of the cell·2012
    Same author

    A computable cellular stress network model for non-diseased pulmonary and cardiovascular tissue.

    BMC systems biology·2011
    Same author

    The Dam1 ring binds to the E-hook of tubulin and diffuses along the microtubule.

    Molecular biology of the cell·2010
    Same journal

    Obstetrical implications of homeotic transformation of vertebrae and assimilation of coccyx with sacrum in humans.

    Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
    Same journal

    Evolutionary morphology of the haplorhine hamate.

    Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
    Same journal

    Ontogenetic skull variation in a round-headed Trogonophidae amphisbaenian species with inferences on bite force.

    Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
    Same journal

    Caught between dimensions: 2D versus 3D geometric morphometrics in biodiversity assessment.

    Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
    Same journal

    Integrated microanatomy and microstructure of the maxillary tooth plate reveal a reinforced feeding system and tougher diet in Late Triassic Hyperodapedontinae (Rhynchosauria, Archosauromorpha).

    Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
    Same journal

    The pelvis doesn't walk by itself: Wider pelves reduce the cost of walking over unstable surfaces.

    Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical research
    • Scientific publishing

    Background:

    • Recent press articles highlight issues with scientific reproducibility.
    • Low success rates (12%-25%) reported when attempting to reproduce preclinical study results.
    • Lack of consensus on the extent and impact of the reproducibility problem.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the magnitude and applicability of the scientific reproducibility problem.
    • To discuss potential strategies for scientific journals to address reproducibility challenges.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of reported reproducibility rates in preclinical studies.
    • Review of existing literature and expert discussions on scientific integrity.
    • Exploration of journal policies and their role in promoting reproducibility.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Significant challenges exist in reproducing published preclinical research findings.
    • The problem of reproducibility impacts the reliability of scientific evidence.
    • Journals have a crucial role in implementing measures to improve reproducibility.

    Conclusions:

    • The low reproducibility rates indicate a critical issue in scientific research.
    • Addressing reproducibility is essential for maintaining scientific rigor and public trust.
    • Journal-led initiatives can significantly enhance the reliability of published scientific work.