Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Diversity of Archaea I01:30

Diversity of Archaea I

669
Archaea, a domain of single-celled microorganisms, are classified into five major phyla based on genetic and biochemical characteristics: Euryarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, Korarchaeota, and Nanoarchaeota. Among these, the phylum Euryarchaeota is notable for its remarkable diversity in morphology, metabolism, and ecological adaptations.Morphological and Metabolic DiversityMembers of Euryarchaeota exhibit a variety of cellular shapes, including rods and cocci. Their metabolic pathways...
669
Cell Diversity01:13

Cell Diversity

5.1K
The concept of a cell started with microscopic observations of dead cork tissue by Robert Hooke in 1665. Hooke coined the term "cell" based on the resemblance of the small subdivisions in the cork to the rooms that monks inhabited, called cells. About ten years later, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek became the first person to observe the living and moving cells under a microscope. In the century that followed, the theory that cells represented the basic unit of life developed.
Multicellular...
5.1K
Diversity of Archaea II01:24

Diversity of Archaea II

532
Archaea, one of the three domains of life, exhibit remarkable diversity and adaptability, thriving in both extreme and moderate environments. Historically, most identified archaea have been classified into two major phyla: Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota. However, recent molecular studies have expanded this classification to include three additional phyla: Thaumarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota, and Korarchaeota, each exhibiting unique characteristics and ecological roles.Thaumarchaeota: Mesophiles...
532
Diversity of Protists I01:15

Diversity of Protists I

1.2K
Excavata is a diverse group of protists that includes both chemoorganotrophic and phototrophic species, with some thriving in anaerobic environments. Among the key groups within Excavata are diplomonads and parabasalids, which are flagellated protists that lack mitochondria and chloroplasts. These microorganisms typically inhabit anoxic environments, such as the intestines of animals, where they exist either symbiotically or as parasites, relying on fermentation for energy production. Some...
1.2K
Diversity of Protists II01:27

Diversity of Protists II

1.2K
Alveolates are a group of organisms recognized by the presence of alveoli, which are cytoplasmic sacs located beneath the cell membrane. While their function remains uncertain, alveoli may help regulate water balance by controlling how much water enters and leaves the cell. In dinoflagellates, these structures may serve as armor plates. There are three major types of alveolates: ciliates, which move using cilia; dinoflagellates, which use flagella for movement; and apicomplexans, which are...
1.2K
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

2.4K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of a transient neonatal visual deprivation on the development of the ventral occipito-temporal cortex in humans.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The origins and development of aesthetics.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2024
Same author

Continued care and provision of glasses are necessary to improve visual and academic outcomes in children: Experience from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of school-based vision screening.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2024
Same author

Multiple pathways to developmental continuity in infant cognition.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2023
Same author

Envisioning a Woman Scientist.

Annual review of vision science·2023
Same author

Developmental changes in audiotactile event perception.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2023
Same journal

Support for the efficient coding account of visual discomfort.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Visual Field Asymmetries in Responses to ON and OFF Pathway Biasing Stimuli.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Pattern reversal chromatic VEPs like onsets, are unaffected by attentional demand.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

The interaction between luminance polarity grouping and symmetry axes on the ERP responses to symmetry.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Electroretinographic responses to periodic stimuli in primates and the relevance for visual perception and for clinical studies.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Synaptotagmin-9 in mouse retina.

Visual neuroscience·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

50.6K

Classification and diversity of amblyopia.

Daphne Maurer1, Suzanne P McKEE2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behavior,McMaster University,Hamilton,Ontario,Canada.

Visual Neuroscience
|June 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Amblyopia, a vision disorder from abnormal childhood visual experiences, is classified by strabismus or anisometropia. This study evaluates the clinical utility of these amblyopia subclassifications.

Keywords:
AcuityAnisometropiaBinocularityContrast sensitivityStrabismus

More Related Videos

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.5K
Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

50.6K
Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

7.5K
Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.7K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Visual Science

Background:

  • Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental vision disorder impacting spatial vision.
  • It arises from abnormal visual experiences during critical developmental periods in childhood.
  • Commonly cited causes include strabismus (eye misalignment) and anisometropia (refractive error differences).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically assess the clinical relevance and utility of current amblyopia subclassifications.
  • To determine if subclassifying amblyopia by strabismus and/or anisometropia aids clinical decision-making or understanding.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing literature on amblyopia etiology and classification.
  • Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and treatment outcomes associated with different amblyopia subtypes.
  • Consideration of the impact of subclassifications on patient management and research.

Main Results:

  • The current subclassifications of amblyopia based on strabismus and anisometropia may not fully capture the complexity of the disorder.
  • The etiological basis for amblyopia can be multifactorial, potentially involving interactions between different visual disturbances.
  • Clinical utility of strict subclassifications requires further validation regarding treatment efficacy and prognostic value.

Conclusions:

  • The established subclassifications of amblyopia require re-evaluation for their practical clinical significance.
  • A more nuanced approach to understanding amblyopia's origins may be necessary for improved patient care.
  • Further research is needed to refine diagnostic categories and therapeutic strategies for amblyopia.