Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Comparison of prognostic systems in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy
Insights
The Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score is the most effective tool for predicting prognosis in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with hepatic encephalopathy, outperforming other common scoring systems.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology and Critical Care Medicine
- Prognostic Biomarkers and Clinical Scoring Systems
Background:
- Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a serious complication in patients with cirrhosis.
- Several scoring systems exist to predict outcomes in critically ill patients with HE, including Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA).
- The optimal scoring system for HE prognosis in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prognostic accuracy of CTP, MELD, APACHE II, and CLIF-SOFA scoring systems.
- To identify the most effective scoring system for predicting the prognosis of cirrhotic patients hospitalized with hepatic encephalopathy in the ICU.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study included 84 patients with known cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy admitted to an internal medicine ICU.
- Hepatic encephalopathy diagnosis and grading were based on West Haven criteria.
- APACHE II, CLIF-SOFA, MELD, and CTP scores were calculated within 24 hours of admission; patient outcomes (discharge or death) were recorded.
Main Results:
- The study analyzed 84 patients with various hepatic encephalopathy etiologies, including infection and variceal bleeding.
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) values indicated superior performance for CLIF-SOFA (0.986), followed by APACHE II (0.974), CTP (0.955), and MELD (0.880).
- CLIF-SOFA demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The CLIF-SOFA scoring system is the most accurate prognostic tool for patients with hepatic encephalopathy in the ICU.
- APACHE II, CTP, and MELD scores also provide prognostic information but are less effective than CLIF-SOFA.
- CLIF-SOFA should be considered the preferred scoring system for risk stratification in this patient population.
Abstract:
Background/aim: There are various scoring systems for evaluating prognosis in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) with hepatic encephalopathy. These include the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II). In this study, we aimed to compare the various scoring systems to determine the best system for showing the prognosis of patients with a prior diagnosis of cirrhosis who were hospitalized for hepatic encephalopathy. Materials and methods: Patients with known cirrhosis hospitalized in the internal medicine ICU of the Adana Numune Education and Research Hospital with a diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy were included in the study. Diagnosis and classification of hepatic encephalopathy were done according to the West Haven criteria. The etiology of hepatic encephalopathy was recorded for all patients. APACHE II, CLIF-SOFA, MELD, and CTP scores were calculated for all patients within the first 24 h. Outcomes of patients were recorded as either discharged or deceased. Demographic and biochemical data, duration of hospitalization, and prognostic factors were compared for both groups. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values were calculated for each scoring system. Results: A total of 84 patients were included in the study. The etiologies of encephalopathy were infection (n = 35, 41.7%), variceal bleeding (n = 19, 22.6%), constipation (n = 15, 17.9%), consuming excessive protein (n = 8, 9.5%), hypokalemia (n = 6, 7.1%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1, 1.2%). Nine patients had grade 1 encephalopathy, 34 patients had grade 2, 27 patients had grade 3, and 14 patients had grade 4. AUROC values were 0.986 (0.970-1.003), 0.974 (0.945-1.003), 0.955 (0.915-0.996), and 0.880 (0.800-0.959) for CLIF-SOFA, APACHE II, CTP, and MELD scores, respectively. Conclusion: We found the best prognostic model for patients who were hospitalized in the ICU for hepatic encephalopathy to be CLIFSOFA, followed by APACHE II, CTP, and MELD scores.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Hepatic Portal System
At its core, the hepatic portal vein is the result of a confluence of the superior and inferior mesenteric veins along with the splenic vein. Each of these veins has a unique role. The superior mesenteric vein is...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Second Order systems II
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

