Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Role of closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: Current status
B Sunil Abhishek1, Anupam Bhambhani1
1Department of Cardiology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, # 82, EPIP Area, Whitefield, Bengaluru 560066, Karnataka, India.
Insights
Patent foramen ovale closure effectively prevents secondary strokes in cryptogenic stroke patients. Device closure is superior to medical management for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke caused by paradoxical embolism.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Ischemic stroke is a major cause of death and disability.
- Cryptogenic stroke, where the cause is unknown, accounts for 20%-40% of cases.
- Paradoxical embolism through cardiac defects like patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a key cause of cryptogenic stroke.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous closure of PFO in preventing secondary strokes.
- To compare device closure with medical management for secondary stroke prevention in PFO patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of randomized trials comparing PFO device closure with medical management.
- Analysis of safety and benefit data for percutaneous closure devices.
Main Results:
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in approximately 25% of the population and is more common in cryptogenic stroke patients.
- Percutaneous closure of PFO using devices is a safe and beneficial secondary prevention strategy.
- Randomized trials demonstrate that device closure is superior to medical management for secondary stroke prevention in cryptogenic stroke patients with PFO.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous PFO closure is a highly effective treatment for secondary stroke prevention in selected patients.
- Device closure offers a superior alternative to medical management for patients with cryptogenic stroke due to PFO.
Abstract:
Ischaemic stroke is among the leading causes of disability and death. Despite extensive vascular, cardiac and serological evaluations, the cause remains unknown in 20%-40% of patients. These are classified as cryptogenic stroke. Paradoxical embolism is one of the many causes of cryptogenic stroke. The term paradoxical embolism is used to describe an embolus of venous origin entering the systemic circulation through a patent foramen ovale (PFO), atrial septal defect (ASD), ventricular septal defect or extracardiac communication such as pulmonary arteriovenous malformation. PFO is present in about 25% of the population. PFO is seen more commonly in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Secondary prevention of stroke in such patients includes the prevention of formation of a thrombus with antiplatelets, vitamin K antagonists or closure of the PFO by either surgery or the percutaneous route. Percutaneous closure using devices has been shown to be safe and beneficial in preventing secondary stroke. Data from randomized trials have shown device closure to be superior to medical management in the secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke due to PFO.
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Marcia's Theory of Identity Status
Electrical Current
Role of Septins
Cellular Functions of Septins
Recent studies have revealed the multifaceted roles of septins in various cellular processes such as cytokinesis, ciliogenesis, and neurogenesis. Septins act as scaffolds and...
The Role of Culture
Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...

