Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.2K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Isolating transdiagnostic effects reveals specific genetic profiles in psychiatric disorders.

JCPP advances·2026
Same author

Cognitive dispersion in established adulthood: etiology and implications for cognitive aging.

Innovation in aging·2026
Same author

Linking the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) With NHS Electronic Health Records.

Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies·2026
Same author

Non-cognitive skills mediate education-related polygenic score associations with academic achievement across development.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Twins and their singleton siblings differ in language, cognition, and social-emotional development.

Child development·2026
Same author

Disorder-Specific Genetic Effects Drive the Associations Between Psychopathology and Cognitive Functioning.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Twin-Screw Extrusion Process to Produce Renewable Fiberboards
07:21

Twin-Screw Extrusion Process to Produce Renewable Fiberboards

Published on: January 27, 2021

7.1K

Monozygotic twin differences in school performance are stable and systematic.

Sophie von Stumm1, Robert Plomin2

  • 1Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK.

Developmental Science
|June 20, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Differences in school performance between identical twins (MZ) are stable and linked to learning-related factors. These non-shared environmental influences have systematic, long-term effects on academic achievement.

Keywords:
Monozygotic twindifference scoreslearningnon-shared environmentschool performance

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.9K
Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

20.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Twin-Screw Extrusion Process to Produce Renewable Fiberboards
07:21

Twin-Screw Extrusion Process to Produce Renewable Fiberboards

Published on: January 27, 2021

7.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.9K
Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

20.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Genetics
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • School performance is highly heritable, yet identical twins (MZ) show performance differences.
  • These differences are attributed to non-shared environments, but few factors have been identified.
  • Existing research suggests non-shared environmental effects are idiosyncratic and trait-specific.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the stability and determinants of school performance differences in monozygotic twins.
  • To explore the relationship between school performance differences and various learning-related variables.
  • To determine the extent to which non-shared environmental factors influence school performance over time.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed data from 2768 monozygotic twin pairs.
  • Assessed school performance differences from age 12 to 16.
  • Correlated school performance differences with 16 learning-related variables (intelligence, personality, attitudes).

Main Results:

  • MZ differences in school performance showed moderate stability from age 12 to 16.
  • School performance differences positively correlated with differences in intelligence, personality, and attitudes.
  • Learning-related variables accounted for 22% of the variance in MZ differences in school performance at age 16.

Conclusions:

  • Non-shared environmental factors impact school performance systematically, with long-term and generalist influence.
  • These findings challenge the notion of idiosyncratic effects in this domain.
  • Further research is needed to identify specific non-shared environmental factors driving these stable differences.