Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sex-linked Disorders01:43

Sex-linked Disorders

109.1K
Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.
109.1K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.9K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

651
The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
651

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cannabidiol dose modulates behavioral response to acute and repeated administration of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol by strain and sex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Alcohol Use Disorder Affects Brain Metals.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Biomimetic ferritin nanocages for synergistic co-delivery of metformin and rapamycin restore neurodevelopmental homeostasis in autism spectrum disorders.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2025
Same author

Biomimetic nanoparticles with enhanced rapamycin delivery for autism spectrum disorder treatment via autophagy activation and oxidative stress modulation.

Theranostics·2024
Same author

Association between lead and circulating markers of inflammation among traffic enforcers in Metro Manila, Philippines: the MMDA traffic enforcer's health study.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2024
Same author

Epigenetic analysis in a murine genetic model of Gulf War illness.

Frontiers in toxicology·2023
Same journal

Age-associated clinical characteristics and <i>ATP7B</i> mutation landscape in pediatric Wilson's disease: a study from southwest China.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Comparative genomics across <i>Linum</i> illuminates the evolutionary basis of flax domestication, genome diversification, and seed oil biosynthesis.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

scCCVGBen for benchmarking of single-cell representation learning anchored on a centroid-coupled variational graph attention autoencoder across scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Codon usage bias and molecular evolution of <i>Dnajc15</i> across avian lineages.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

CircRNAs in hepatic lipid metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and clinical implications.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of diagnostic KASP markers for MYMIV resistance in urdbean.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K

Sex Differences in Neurotoxicogenetics.

Carolina Torres-Rojas1, Byron C Jones1,2

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.

Frontiers in Genetics
|June 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sex significantly impacts disease outcomes and toxicant responses, alongside genetics and environment. Understanding these sex differences is crucial for personalized medicine and environmental health.

Keywords:
drugsimprinting effectsneurotoxicitysex differencessex susceptibilitytoxicantstoxicogenetics

More Related Videos

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells
06:28

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells

Published on: July 28, 2023

856
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K
In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells
06:28

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells

Published on: July 28, 2023

856
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research
  • Environmental toxicology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Sex is increasingly recognized as a critical factor influencing disease susceptibility, treatment efficacy, and patient outcomes.
  • Individual responses to environmental toxicants are complex, involving genetic makeup, environmental exposures, and biological sex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and present evidence highlighting the significant role of sex in the toxicity of various environmental toxicants.
  • To underscore that sex differences in toxicant response are integral to an individual's genetic constitution.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies investigating sex-specific toxicological effects.
  • Synthesis of evidence demonstrating the contribution of sex to toxicant susceptibility.
  • Analysis of the interplay between genetics, environment, and sex in determining toxicant responses.

Main Results:

  • Evidence indicates that sex is a key determinant in the susceptibility to a wide range of environmental toxicants.
  • Sex differences in toxicant response are observed across various exposure scenarios and toxic agents.
  • The contribution of sex to toxicant susceptibility is comparable to that of genetic and environmental factors.

Conclusions:

  • Sex is a fundamental variable that must be considered in toxicology and environmental health research.
  • Acknowledging sex differences is essential for developing accurate risk assessments and effective public health strategies.
  • Future research should prioritize investigating sex-specific mechanisms underlying toxicant-induced health effects.