Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a guide to treat coronary artery disease
Fabio Mangiacapra1, Edoardo Bressi1, Alessandro Sticchi1
1a Unit of Cardiovascular Science , Campus Bio-Medico University , Rome , Italy.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) accurately identifies ischemia-causing coronary lesions, guiding treatment decisions. FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) shows superior outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI or medical therapy alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Myocardial ischemia extent is critical for coronary artery disease (CAD) prognosis.
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) distinguishes ischemia-inducing lesions, unlike coronary angiography alone.
- FFR enables targeted revascularization decisions in CAD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of FFR's role in diagnosing and treating CAD.
- To discuss the underlying coronary physiology and procedural aspects of FFR.
- To review landmark trials, current applications, and future research directions for FFR.
Main Methods:
- Review of FFR technique, including coronary physiology and catheterization laboratory procedures.
- Analysis of landmark clinical trials and current applications in various coronary lesions and syndromes.
- Comparison of FFR with non-hyperemic indices and noninvasive techniques.
Main Results:
- FFR remains the gold standard for detecting ischemia-inducing coronary stenoses, outperforming non-hyperemic indices and noninvasive methods.
- FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrates superior outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI.
- FFR-guided PCI is also superior to medical therapy alone for selected CAD patients.
Conclusions:
- FFR is unsurpassed in diagnostic performance for identifying significant coronary stenoses.
- FFR-guided PCI offers improved clinical outcomes in CAD management.
- Ongoing research will further define FFR's role, particularly in severe multivessel disease compared to cardiac surgery.
Introduction:
The presence and extent of myocardial ischemia are the major determinants of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Unlike coronary angiography alone, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has enabled interventional cardiologists to accurately determine whether coronary atherosclerotic plaques are responsible for myocardial ischemia, and therefore deserve to be revascularized. Areas covered: An overview on the role of FFR in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease, as well as the potential related controversies is provided. Authors describe the coronary physiology underneath this technique and all the procedural aspects in the catheterization laboratory. The landmark trials and the current applications in different coronary lesions and syndromes are also described and potential future research involving FFR and comparisons with other methodologies for the evaluation of coronary physiology are introduced. Expert commentary: FFR is still unsurpassed in diagnostic performance when compared to non-hyperemic indices and noninvasive techniques, and remains the gold standard for the detection of ischemia-inducing coronary stenoses. FFR-guided PCI has been demonstrated superior to an angiography-guided PCI and over medical therapy alone, and ongoing investigation will clarify whether it could perform better, or at least equalize the results of cardiac surgery in patients with severe multivessel disease.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction

