Fatigue Resistance of New and Used Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: a Comparative Study

Aim of the present study was twofold. First, to evaluate in vitro, the performance of two different NiTi rotary instruments in one molar case; then, to evaluate their resistance to cyclic fatigue, compared to new ones.

25 ProTaper Next (PTN) nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments (Maillefer-Dentsply, Baillagues, CH) for each of the following two sizes: X1 (17.04 ) and X2 (25.06) were randomly divided into two groups. The first group (n = 10) immediately under- went to a cyclic fatigue test. The second group (n = 15) was initially used to prepare 15 extracted molar teeth and then subjected to a cyclic fatigue test. Same was done for 25 Horizen (HZ) instruments (Kerr Endodontics, Orange, Ca) for each of the following two sizes: 20.04 and 25.06. Instruments were rotated in curved artificial canal until fracture occurred and times to fracture were recorded. All data were collected and statistically analyzed using a variance test (confidence interval CI = 95%).

HZ reached working length more rapidly than PTN, and with less deformations. For the fatigue tests, all the new instruments were significantly more resistant than the used ones. The HZ instru- ments were significantly more resistant in all sizes than PTN, both when new and used instruments were tested.

Since in previous studies ProTaper Next demonstra- ted a better resistance to cyclic fatigue than most of nickel-titanium instruments, Horizen's performance put them in a high rank amongst the most resistant nickel-titanium rotary instruments.