Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Key Elements of Photo Attraction Bioassay for Insect Studies or Monitoring Programs
Published on: July 26, 2018
Just How Attractive is the ATTRACT Trial?
Gerard J O'Sullivan1, Rick de Graaf2, Steven A Black3
1Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland. gerard.osullivan2@hse.ie.
Catheter-directed thrombolysis did not significantly improve outcomes for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) patients compared to standard care. The ATTRACT trial found no reduction in post-thrombotic syndrome rates at two years.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a significant public health concern with high mortality.
- VTE causes more deaths in Western Europe than several major diseases combined.
- The ATTRACT trial investigated the efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis for DVT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical benefit of adding catheter-directed thrombolysis to standard therapy for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- To assess the impact on the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) at two years post-treatment.
Main Methods:
- The study was a large, prospective, multi-centre, randomized controlled trial (RCT).
- It compared standard therapy (anticoagulation and compression stockings) with standard therapy plus catheter-directed thrombolysis.
- Outcomes were assessed over a two-year period.
Main Results:
- The addition of catheter-directed thrombolysis to standard therapy showed no significant clinical benefit.
- There was no significant reduction in the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) at two years compared to standard therapy alone.
- The ATTRACT trial represents a culmination of extensive planning and execution in VTE research.
Conclusions:
- Catheter-directed thrombolysis is not superior to standard therapy for acute DVT in reducing PTS rates.
- The findings from the ATTRACT trial provide crucial insights into DVT management.
- Further analysis of limitations and future research directions are warranted based on these results.
More Related Videos
08:11Stripe Assay to Study the Attractive or Repulsive Activity of a Protein Substrate Using Dissociated Hippocampal Neurons
Published on: June 19, 2016
10:09Migration, Chemo-Attraction, and Co-Culture Assays for Human Stem Cell-Derived Endothelial Cells and GABAergic Neurons
Published on: January 23, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Local Attraction
Understanding Interpersonal Attraction
Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction