Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes following orchidopexy for cryptorchidism before or after

B S R Allin1,2, E Dumann3, D Fawkner-Corbett2

  • 1National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit University of Oxford Oxford UK.

BJS Open
|June 29, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Early orchidopexy (before 1 year) for cryptorchidism shows no difference in atrophy or complication rates compared to delayed surgery. However, early intervention may improve fertility potential, though data imprecision limits conclusions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Urology
  • Developmental Biology

Background:

  • Current guidelines recommend orchidopexy for cryptorchidism by 12 months of age.
  • Adherence to this guideline is not universal.
  • This study compares outcomes of early versus delayed orchidopexy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes between orchidopexies performed before and after 1 year of age for cryptorchidism.
  • To evaluate testicular atrophy, fertility potential, and postoperative complications.
  • To assess the impact of surgical timing on testicular outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of MEDLINE and Embase databases (searched September 2015).
  • Included studies compared early (<1 year) versus delayed (≥1 year) orchidopexy.
  • Exclusion criteria: >50% intra-abdominal testes or disorders of sexual differentiation.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in testicular atrophy rates between early and delayed orchidopexy (912 testes).
  • Early orchidopexy was associated with greater testicular volume and more spermatogonia per tubule (382 testes).
  • No difference in postoperative complication rates was observed (426 testes).

Conclusions:

  • Orchidopexy timing (early vs. delayed) does not appear to affect atrophy or complication rates.
  • Early orchidopexy may offer better fertility potential.
  • Data imprecision limits the certainty of these findings.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
609
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.5K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
10.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.2K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups01:09

Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
6.0K