Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Mixed Reality for Education MRE Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering
Published on: June 23, 2023
Neural engagement with online educational videos predicts learning performance for individual students
Samantha S Cohen1, Jens Madsen2, Gad Touchan2
1The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, United States; The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.
Abstract:
Online educational materials are largely disseminated through videos, and yet there is little understanding of how these videos engage students and fuel academic success. We hypothesized that components of the electroencephalogram (EEG), previously shown to reflect video engagement, would be predictive of academic performance in the context of educational videos. Two groups of subjects watched educational videos in either an intentional learning paradigm, in which they were aware of an upcoming test, or in an incidental learning paradigm, in which they were unaware that they would be tested. "Neural engagement" was quantified by the inter-subject correlation (ISC) of the EEG that was evoked by the videos. In both groups, students with higher neural engagement retained more information. Neural engagement also discriminated between attentive and inattentive video viewing. These results suggest that this EEG metric is a marker of the stimulus-related attentional mechanisms necessary to retain information. In the future, EEG may be used as a tool to design and assess online educational content.
Related Concept Videos
Student t Distribution
The Student t distribution was developed by William S. Goset (1876–1937) of the...
Microsoft Excel: Student's t-Test
To conduct a t-test in Excel, use the T.TEST function or the "Data...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Impact of Individuals on Individuals
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

