Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

A High-Fidelity Porcine Model of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Following Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: June 6, 2025
The evolution of donation after circulatory death renal transplantation: a decade of experience
Richard Bell1, Shahid Farid1, Sanjay Pandanaboyana1,2
1Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.
Insights
Kidney transplants from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors show comparable long-term survival and function to those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. Extended criteria DCD grafts offer benefits over dialysis for selected patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Surgery
- Organ Donation
Background:
- Comparing long-term outcomes of renal transplantation using donors after circulatory death (DCD) versus donation after brain death (DBD).
- Study conducted at a major UK transplant center.
- Analysis of deceased donor kidney transplants between 2002 and 2014.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare graft survival (GS) and patient survival (PS) between DCD and DBD kidney donors.
- To evaluate outcomes based on standard criteria donors (SCD) and extended criteria donors (ECD).
- To identify risk factors affecting graft function and survival.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 468 DCD and 905 DBD renal transplants.
- Comparison of GS and PS up to 10 years post-transplantation.
- Assessment of graft function at 3 months and identification of risk factors for delayed graft function and reduced survival.
Main Results:
- Comparable GS (61% vs 55%) and PS (78% vs 71%) between DCD and DBD donors up to 10 years.
- Worse GS and function in ECD groups, with no difference between EC-DBD and EC-DCD.
- DCD donors identified as a risk factor for delayed graft function; post-operative complications and EC-DCD donation linked to reduced GS and PS.
Conclusions:
- DCD renal grafts demonstrate comparable long-term survival and function to DBD grafts.
- Use of extended criteria DCD (EC-DCD) grafts is viable for selected recipients, offering advantages over dialysis.
- Findings support the expanded use of DCD donors in renal transplantation.
Background:
This study compared long-term outcomes of renal transplantation from donors following donation after circulatory death (DCD) with those following donation after brain death (DBD) from one of the largest centres in the UK.
Method:
Recipients of renal transplants from deceased donors between 2002 and 2014 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes were compared between DCD (468) and DBD (905) donors and between standard criteria donors (SCDs) and extended criteria donors (ECDs).
Results:
Graft survival (GS) and patient survival (PS) from DCD and DBD donors were comparable up to 10 years (GS: 61 versus 55%, P = 0.780; PS: 78 versus 71%, P = 0.285, respectively). Graft function was comparable after 3 months. GS and function were worse in the ECD groups, with no difference between EC-DBD and EC-DCD. PS in the ECD groups was worse than the SCD groups and PS in the EC-DCD group was worse than in the EC-DBD group. DCD donors were an independent risk factor for delayed graft function. Post-operative complications and EC-DCD donation were independent risk factors for reduced GS and PS.
Conclusion:
This study supports the use of DCD renal grafts with comparable long-term survival and function to DBD grafts. The use of EC-DCD grafts is justified in selected recipients and provides acceptable function and survival advantages over dialysis.
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Circulatory System
The Evidence for Evolution
Convergent Evolution
Eukaryotic Evolution
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Synteny and Evolution
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
What is an Experiment?

