Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

67.9K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
67.9K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

268.9K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
268.9K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

65.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
65.8K
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

89.1K
Scientific Laws
89.1K
Creative Thinking01:25

Creative Thinking

1.3K
Creative thinking encompasses innovative and unconventional methods for addressing challenges, often leading to groundbreaking solutions. Instead of focusing solely on enhancing existing systems, such as increasing smartphone battery capacity, creative thinking might inspire advancements like energy-efficient batteries or processors that minimize power consumption. This multidimensional approach underscores the importance of exploring novel pathways to innovation.
Divergent thinking is the...
1.3K
Chromosome Replication02:31

Chromosome Replication

10.7K
Before a cell can divide, it must accurately replicate all of its chromosomes, including the DNA and its associated histone and non-histone proteins.  This process begins at numerous origins of replication during the S phase of the cell cycle in each of a cell’s chromosomes simultaneously. Certain nucleotides can act as origins of replication, but these sequences are not well defined - especially in complex, multi-cellular, eukaryotic species. The length of DNA that spans an origin...
10.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceiving semantic attributes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Virtually the same? A comparison between in-person and virtual mock jury deliberations.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same author

A New Look at Vaccination Behaviors and Intentions: The Case of Influenza.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Dual-systems and Fuzzy-trace Theory Predictions of COVID-19 Risk Taking in Young Adults.

Decision (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same author

Deep distortions in faces and places.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Developmental change and invariance in verbatim and gist memory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications of the dual-retrieval model.

Psychology and aging·2025
Same journal

On the Goals and Limitations of Psychological Science: Some Thoughts in Memory of Daniel Kahneman.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Imagine No Resources: Attention Is Selection and Normalization for Choice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Children's Third-Party Punishment Reveals a Genuine Concern for Fairness and Justice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Chaos Theory and Child Development: Quantifying Nonlinear Pathways of Growth.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Formal Modeling as Theoretical Glue between Laboratory and Naturalistic Studies of Memory.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Growing Technological Opacity and the Social Brain.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
10:25

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping

Published on: September 25, 2019

49.4K

Replication, Registration, and Scientific Creativity.

C J Brainerd1, Valerie F Reyna1

  • 1Department of Human Development and Institute for Human Neuroscience, Cornell University.

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|July 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bureaucratic hurdles in psychological science hinder creativity and scientific progress. This study explores enhancing replicability without increasing administrative burdens, aiming to foster both scientific rigor and innovation.

Keywords:
emotional contextgist and verbatim processingreplicationscientific creativity

More Related Videos

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.6K
Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
05:05

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
10:25

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping

Published on: September 25, 2019

49.4K
Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay
09:21

Quantitative Real-Time PCR using the Thermo Scientific Solaris qPCR Assay

Published on: June 17, 2010

50.6K
Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
05:05

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Science
  • Cognitive Science
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • The increasing bureaucratization of psychological science is a growing concern.
  • Administrative hurdles are often implemented to improve the replicability of research findings.
  • These measures may inadvertently stifle scientific creativity and intellectual exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the cognitive impact of administrative hurdles on scientific creativity.
  • To investigate the relationship between bureaucratization, replicability, and creativity in psychology.
  • To explore strategies for enhancing research replicability without compromising scientific innovation.

Main Methods:

  • Cognitive analysis of administrative processes in psychological research.
  • Examination of the focus on verbatim processing within current replicability efforts.
  • Assessment of the emotional context surrounding research administration.

Main Results:

  • Bureaucratic hurdles, particularly those emphasizing verbatim processing and negative emotional contexts, impair scientific creativity.
  • The current approach to ensuring replicability may be counterproductive to fostering novel scientific insights.
  • There is a foreseeable consequence of reduced intellectual output due to administrative overload.

Conclusions:

  • Enhancing replicability requires careful consideration to avoid impeding scientific creativity.
  • Alternative approaches may be needed to balance rigor and innovation in psychological research.
  • Further research is needed to develop methods that support both scientific reproducibility and creative exploration.