Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy Model for Ischemic Retinal Diseases in Rodents
Published on: September 16, 2020
Non-contact retinal imaging compared to indirect ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity screening: infant
S Grace Prakalapakorn1, Sandra S Stinnett2, Sharon F Freedman2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. grace.prakalapakorn@duke.edu.
Insights
Non-contact retinal imaging is a safer alternative for retinopathy of prematurity screening in infants. This method resulted in fewer cardiopulmonary events compared to traditional indirect ophthalmoscopy.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neonatal Care
Background:
- Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is crucial for premature infants.
- Current ROP screening via indirect ophthalmoscopy can be stressful for infants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety of non-contact retinal camera imaging versus indirect ophthalmoscopy for ROP screening.
- To evaluate cardiopulmonary events as an indicator of infant stress during ROP screening.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 99 infants undergoing ROP screening.
- Comparison of safety events (bradycardia, tachycardia, oxygen desaturation, apnea) between indirect ophthalmoscopy and non-contact retinal imaging.
Main Results:
- Safety events occurred in 0.8% of imaging sessions versus 5.8% of examinations.
- Non-contact retinal imaging showed a statistically significant reduction in safety events (p=0.015).
Conclusions:
- Non-contact retinal camera imaging is a well-tolerated and less stressful alternative for ROP screening.
- This imaging method offers improved infant safety during ROP examinations.
Objective:
Most retinopathy of prematurity screening involves an ophthalmologist performing indirect ophthalmoscopy, which can be stressful to infants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile (using cardiopulmonary events as an indicator) of imaging infants with a non-contact retinal camera compared to examining them using indirect ophthalmoscopy.
Study Design:
Prospective cohort study of 99 infants at a community hospital who were examined using indirect ophthalmoscopy and imaged using a non-contact retinal camera for retinopathy of prematurity. We evaluated the difference in the occurrence of safety events (i.e., clinically significant bradycardia, tachycardia, oxygen desaturation, or apnea) following the clinical examination versus retinal imaging.
Result:
Safety events occurred after 0.8% (n = 1) of imaging sessions and 5.8% (n = 18) of clinical examinations (mean difference = -0.055 (p = 0.015), favoring imaging).
Conclusion:
Retinal imaging with a non-contact camera was well tolerated and less stressful to infants compared to indirect ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist.
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Indirect Motor Pathways
The vestibulospinal tract originates in the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem. The vestibular system detects changes in...
Contact Angle
The adhesive force is the molecular force between molecules of different materials, that is, between the molecules of the solid and the liquid. The cohesive...
Contact-dependent Signaling
Gap Junctions
In animal cells, gap junctions are formed...
EDTA: Indirect and Alkalimetric Titration
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety

