Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Global Climate Change01:50

Global Climate Change

29.0K
Throughout its ~4.5 billion year history, the Earth has experienced periods of warming and cooling. However, the current drastic increase in global temperatures is well outside of the Earth’s cyclic norms, and evidence for human-caused global climate change is compelling. Paleoclimatology, the study of ancient climate conditions, provides ample evidence for human-caused global climate change by comparing recent conditions with those in the past.
29.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.4K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.4K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

8.8K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
8.8K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AMI-SSS01 portable phonocardiographic examination with AI-assisted assessment for detecting heart failure exacerbations in home-based medical care in Japanese primary care clinics: a study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Rehabilitative intervention of frailty for patients with chronic respiratory disease (REINFORCE study): research protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Journal of thoracic disease·2026
Same author

Evaluating the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay as a treatment monitoring tool for pulmonary tuberculosis: protocol for a prospective longitudinal study in Nairobi, Kenya.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Clinically informed intermediate reasoning enables generalizable prostate cancer prognostication through machine learning in limited settings.

NPJ digital medicine·2025
Same author

Microplastics in Human Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)·2025
Same author

Novel imaging diagnosis of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus using topological data analysis: A retrospective study.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish
05:41

Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish

Published on: January 28, 2020

10.4K

Fast score test with global null estimation regardless of missing genotypes.

Shuntaro Sato1,2, Masao Ueki3,

  • 1Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan.

Plos One
|July 6, 2018
PubMed
Summary

New score tests (PM1 and PM2) accelerate genome-wide association studies (GWASs) by efficiently handling missing genotype data. These methods offer significant computational speed improvements over existing tests for binary traits.

More Related Videos

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.
09:38

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.

Published on: June 12, 2009

26.8K
Pyrosequencing: A Simple Method for Accurate Genotyping
13:06

Pyrosequencing: A Simple Method for Accurate Genotyping

Published on: January 8, 2008

28.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish
05:41

Genotyping and Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Staining in Zebrafish

Published on: January 28, 2020

10.4K
The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.
09:38

The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.

Published on: June 12, 2009

26.8K
Pyrosequencing: A Simple Method for Accurate Genotyping
13:06

Pyrosequencing: A Simple Method for Accurate Genotyping

Published on: January 8, 2008

28.1K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) commonly use logistic regression for binary traits.
  • Existing methods like Wald, likelihood ratio, and conventional score tests (CST) face computational challenges with missing genotype data.
  • Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) in Wald and likelihood ratio tests is computationally intensive for each SNP.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel score tests (PM1 and PM2) that enhance computational efficiency in GWASs, particularly with missing genotype data.
  • To provide a faster alternative to existing association tests by utilizing a single global null estimator.
  • To evaluate the performance and applicability of the proposed score tests.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed two new score tests, PM1 and PM2, employing a single global null estimator for all SNPs, irrespective of missing genotypes.
  • Conducted theoretical analysis to compare the asymptotic power of PM1 and PM2 with CST.
  • Performed simulation studies and applied the methods to real GWAS data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).

Main Results:

  • PM2 demonstrates equivalent asymptotic power to CST, while PM1 has asymptotically lower power.
  • The proposed score tests (PM1 and PM2) significantly improve computational speed, ranging from 6 to 18 times faster than existing tests on ADNI-GWAS data.
  • Type I error rates and power were evaluated, confirming theoretical results through simulations and real data application.

Conclusions:

  • The novel score tests, PM1 and PM2, offer substantial computational advantages for GWASs by efficiently managing missing genotype data.
  • These methods maintain statistical power while drastically reducing computation time, making them valuable for large-scale genetic studies.
  • The developed score tests are general and can be extended to other regression models.