Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026
10:36
Probiotic Studies in Neonatal Mice Using Gavage
Published on: January 27, 2019
20.8K
Para-probiotics for Preterm Neonates-The Next Frontier.
Girish Deshpande1,2, Gayatri Athalye-Jape3, Sanjay Patole4
1Department of Neonatology, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia. girish.deshpande@health.nsw.gov.au.
Nutrients
|July 7, 2018
Summary
Paraprobiotics, or non-viable microbial cells, show promise as safe alternatives to probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Further research is needed to confirm their efficacy and safety in this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Microbiology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Probiotics are recommended for preterm neonates to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis, mortality, and late-onset sepsis.
- Concerns regarding probiotic sepsis, inflammation, and antibiotic resistance limit widespread adoption.
- The viability of probiotics is questioned, prompting exploration of alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate paraprobiotics as potentially safer alternatives to probiotics in preterm neonates.
- To address safety concerns associated with live probiotic administration in vulnerable infants.
- To explore a new frontier in neonatal gut health management.
Main Methods:
- Review of current evidence on probiotics and paraprobiotics in preterm neonates.
- Analysis of safety concerns, including probiotic sepsis and translocation risks.
- Consideration of the definition and function of paraprobiotics (non-viable microbial cells or extracts).
Main Results:
- Paraprobiotics are suggested as potentially safe alternatives to live probiotics for preterm infants.
- Non-viable microbial cells may offer benefits without the risks of live bacteria translocation.
- Current evidence supports further investigation into paraprobiotics' role.
Conclusions:
- Paraprobiotics present a promising, potentially safer, alternative for preterm neonate gut health.
- High-quality clinical trials, including randomized controlled trials, are essential.
- Further research is warranted to establish the efficacy and safety of paraprobiotics in this population.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Directing Effect of Substituents: ortho–para-Directing Groups
8.5K
Ortho–para directors are substituent groups attached to the benzene ring and direct the addition of an electrophile to the positions ortho or para to the substituent. All electron-donating groups are considered ortho–para directors. They donate electrons to the ring and make the ring more electron-rich. The ring is therefore susceptible to the addition of electrophiles. Substituents such as amino, hydroxy, or alkoxy, containing lone pairs on the atom adjacent to the ring, donate...
8.5K
01:24ortho–para-Directing Deactivators: Halogens
6.8K
Halogens are ortho–para directors. They are more electronegative than carbon. Therefore, as ring substituents, they can withdraw electrons through the inductive effect and deactivate the aromatic ring towards electrophilic substitution. Halogens also have an electron-donating resonance effect on the ring, which influences the orientation of the incoming electrophile. If an electrophile attacks at the ortho or the para position, the halogen donates electrons and stabilizes the intermediate...
6.8K
01:11ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –NH2, –OCH3
7.5K
All ortho–para directors, excluding halogens, are activating groups. These groups donate electrons to the ring, making the ring carbons electron-rich. Consequently, the reactivity of the aromatic ring towards electrophilic substitution increases. For instance, the nitration of anisole is about 10,000 times faster than the nitration of benzene. The electron-donating effect of the methoxy group in anisole activates the ortho and para positions on the ring and stabilizes the corresponding...
7.5K