Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
Published on: March 3, 2023
Sharpening the focus: differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research
Nicole Doria1, Brian Condran1, Leah Boulos1
1Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 1V7 Canada.
Using distinct terms like "focus groups" for research and "discussion groups" for patient engagement clarifies roles in health research. This distinction aids researchers and ethics boards in understanding patient engagement within patient-oriented research.
Area of Science:
- Health systems research
- Patient-oriented research
- Qualitative research methodology
Background:
- Patient engagement is crucial in patient-oriented research (POR) but often confused with research activities.
- Canadian health systems researchers and research ethics boards (REBs) lack clarity on differentiating focus groups for research versus patient engagement.
- Canada's Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) emphasizes patient engagement, necessitating clear methodological distinctions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To differentiate between focus groups used for qualitative research and those used for patient engagement.
- To provide clear guidelines for using distinct terminology (focus groups vs. discussion groups) to improve clarity in research planning and ethics submissions.
- To support the appropriate implementation of patient engagement within the framework of SPOR.
Main Methods:
- Distinguishing between research activities (focus groups) and patient engagement activities (discussion groups).
- Developing internal guidelines for the design and conduct of both focus groups and discussion groups.
- Comparing and contrasting theoretical frameworks, REB review, participant identification, data collection/analysis, rigor, and dissemination for both types of groups.
Main Results:
- Using distinct terms like 'focus groups' for research and 'discussion groups' for patient engagement enhances clarity.
- The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit developed guidelines to encourage the appropriate use of discussion groups for patient engagement.
- Clearer distinctions improve research planning and submissions to research ethics boards.
Conclusions:
- The developed guidelines address a key methodological challenge in patient-oriented research.
- Implementing distinct terminology and guidelines benefits Canadian and international health systems researchers, patients, and REBs.
- This approach supports the effective integration of patient engagement in health research.
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
Coping Strategies: Emotion Focused
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...

