Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

259
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
259
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

21.0K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
21.0K
Activation Energy01:26

Activation Energy

86.8K
Activation energy is the minimum amount of energy necessary for a chemical reaction to move forward. The higher the activation energy, the slower the rate of the reaction. However, adding heat to the reaction will increase the rate, since it causes molecules to move faster and increase the likelihood that molecules will collide. The collision and breaking of bonds represents the uphill phase of a reaction and generates the transition state. The transition state is an unstable high-energy state...
86.8K
Co-activators and Co-repressors02:04

Co-activators and Co-repressors

8.7K
Gene transcription is regulated by the synergistic action of several proteins that form a complex at a gene regulatory site. This is observed in eukaryotes, where the regulation of gene expression is a complex process. Regulatory proteins in eukaryotes can broadly be classified into two types – regulators that bind directly to specific DNA sequences and co-regulators that associate with regulatory proteins but cannot directly bind to the DNA. These co-regulators are further divided into...
8.7K
tRNA Activation02:26

tRNA Activation

23.0K
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are present in both eukaryotes and bacteria. Though eukaryotes have 20 different aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to couple to 20 amino acids, many bacteria do not have genes for all of these aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Despite this, they still use all 20 amino acids to synthesize their proteins. For instance, some bacteria do not have the gene encoding the enzyme that couples glutamine with its partner tRNA. In these organisms, one enzyme adds glutamic acid to all of the...
23.0K
Eukaryotic Transcription Activators02:42

Eukaryotic Transcription Activators

12.8K
Transcription activators are proteins that promote the transcription of genes from DNA to RNA. In most cases, these proteins contain two separate domains ‒ a domain that binds to DNA and a domain for activating transcription; however, in some cases, a single domain is responsible for both binding and activation of transcription, as seen in the glucocorticoid receptor and MyoD.
The binding domains are capable of recognizing and interacting with regulatory sequences on the DNA. These...
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The application of artificial intelligence in the context of person-centred care - a discourse on pitfalls and possibilities.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

Subset selection based fusion for biomedical information retrieval tasks.

BMC bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Combating health misinformation with fusion-based credible retrieval techniques.

Health informatics journal·2025
Same author

Management of fatigue in gynaecological cancer: A feasibility study of an app-based exercise and mindfulness intervention.

Gynecologic oncology reports·2025
Same author

GSAformer: Group sparse attention transformer for functional brain network analysis.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2025
Same author

Miniformer: A Minimalist Transformer for Brain Functional Networks Analysis.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.3K

Automatic Annotation for Human Activity Recognition in Free Living Using a Smartphone.

Federico Cruciani1, Ian Cleland2, Chris Nugent3

  • 1Computer Science Research Institute, Ulster University, Newtownabbey BT370QB, UK. f.cruciani@ulster.ac.uk.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 11, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an automatic labeling method to speed up data annotation for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems. The approach achieves high precision, enabling robust machine learning models despite potential label noise.

Keywords:
automatic annotationhuman activity recognitioninertial sensorslabel noisesmartphonesupervised machine learning

More Related Videos

Smartphone Fundus Photography
05:51

Smartphone Fundus Photography

Published on: July 6, 2017

40.2K
Author Spotlight: An Alternative Approach to Protein Quantification by Bradford Assay Using a Smartphone
07:41

Author Spotlight: An Alternative Approach to Protein Quantification by Bradford Assay Using a Smartphone

Published on: September 8, 2023

5.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.3K
Smartphone Fundus Photography
05:51

Smartphone Fundus Photography

Published on: July 6, 2017

40.2K
Author Spotlight: An Alternative Approach to Protein Quantification by Bradford Assay Using a Smartphone
07:41

Author Spotlight: An Alternative Approach to Protein Quantification by Bradford Assay Using a Smartphone

Published on: September 8, 2023

5.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Data annotation is a significant bottleneck in developing Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems, particularly for personalized and online applications.
  • Supervised machine learning (ML) methods require large, labeled datasets, which are difficult and time-consuming to acquire, especially for user-specific HAR data.
  • Addressing inter-person variability in smartphone-based HAR necessitates specialized, labeled datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an automated method for labeling datasets collected under free-living conditions using smartphones.
  • To evaluate the robustness of common supervised classification algorithms when faced with noisy data labels.
  • To facilitate the creation of larger, more diverse datasets for HAR research.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an automatic labeling technique for smartphone-based data collection in natural environments.
  • Investigation of the performance of various supervised ML classifiers (Neural Networks, Random Forests, Nearest Centroid, Multi-Class SVM) on automatically labeled and noisy datasets.
  • Validation using a 38-day manually labeled dataset collected in free-living conditions.

Main Results:

  • The automatic labeling method achieved an average precision rate of 80-85% compared to manual labeling.
  • Supervised models trained on automatically generated labels attained an 84% f-score (Neural Networks, Random Forests).
  • Label noise significantly impacted performance, reducing the f-score to 64-74% for certain classifiers (Nearest Centroid, Multi-Class SVM).

Conclusions:

  • Automated data labeling is a viable strategy to accelerate HAR dataset creation in real-world settings.
  • While automated labels yield strong ML performance, classifier robustness to label noise is crucial for reliable HAR systems.
  • Further research should focus on enhancing noise-resilient algorithms for practical, personalized HAR applications.