Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
Published on: November 6, 2017
MACE for the Diagnosis of Dementia and MCI: 3-Year Pragmatic Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study
Background/Aims:
The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (MACE) is a relatively new short cognitive screening instrument for the detection of patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Few studies of the MACE have been reported hitherto. The aim of this study was to undertake a pragmatic diagnostic test accuracy study of MACE in a large cohort of patients seen in a dedicated cognitive disorders clinic.
Methods:
MACE was administered to consecutive patients referred to a neurology-led Cognitive Function Clinic over the course of 3 years to assess its performance for the diagnosis of dementia and MCI using various test metrics.
Results:
In a cohort of 599 patients, the prevalence of dementia and MCI by criterion diagnosis was 0.17 and 0.29, respectively. MACE had a high sensitivity (> 0.9) and negative predictive values (> 0.8) with large effect sizes (Cohen's d > 1) for the diagnosis of both dementia and MCI but a low specificity (< 0.5) and positive predictive values (≤0.5).
Conclusion:
MACE is an acceptable test for the assessment of cognitive complaints in a secondary care setting with good metrics for identifying cases of both dementia and MCI.
Insights
The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (MACE) effectively screens for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in cognitive clinics. While it excels at ruling out these conditions, its accuracy in confirming them requires further consideration.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cognitive Science
- Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Background:
- The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (MACE) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
- Limited research exists on MACE's diagnostic performance.
- This study evaluated MACE in a large cohort within a specialized cognitive disorders clinic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a pragmatic diagnostic test accuracy study of MACE.
- To assess MACE's performance in identifying dementia and MCI in a secondary care setting.
- To evaluate MACE using various diagnostic test metrics.
Main Methods:
- MACE was administered to consecutive patients referred to a neurology-led Cognitive Function Clinic over three years.
- Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
- Criterion diagnosis was used as the gold standard for dementia and MCI.
Main Results:
- The study included 599 patients, with dementia prevalence of 17% and MCI prevalence of 29%.
- MACE demonstrated high sensitivity (>0.9) and negative predictive values (>0.8) for both dementia and MCI.
- MACE showed low specificity (<0.5) and positive predictive values (≤0.5).
Conclusions:
- MACE is a suitable tool for evaluating cognitive complaints in secondary care.
- The instrument shows strong performance in ruling out dementia and MCI.
- Further evaluation may be needed to enhance the positive predictive accuracy of MACE.
More Related Videos
06:23The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Dementia
The progression of dementia is generally gradual....
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision