Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conformity01:20

Conformity

48.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Social Scripts02:10

Social Scripts

10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

26.9K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

36.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

39.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Humans do not "play fair" with social robots: Unequal task sharing in an attentional task.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Measuring trust in artificial intelligence with the N2pc component.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Humans take the visuospatial perspective of robots and objects that imply social presence.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Pharmacological PINK1 activation ameliorates Pathology in Parkinson's Disease models.

Research square·2024
Same author

Social perception of robots is shaped by beliefs about their minds.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Specialty Grand Challenge Article- Social Neuroergonomics.

Frontiers in neuroergonomics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

High-Pressure NMR Experiments for Detecting Protein Low-Lying Conformational States
04:37

High-Pressure NMR Experiments for Detecting Protein Low-Lying Conformational States

Published on: June 29, 2021

3.2K

Under Pressure: Examining Social Conformity With Computer and Robot Groups.

Nicholas Hertz1, Eva Wiese1

  • 1George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

Human Factors
|July 14, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Nonhuman agents like computers and robots can cause social conformity in humans. This effect varies based on the task type and how human-like the agents appear.

Keywords:
compliance and reliancedecision makinghuman–automation interactionsocial psychologytrust in automation

More Related Videos

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.1K
SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

High-Pressure NMR Experiments for Detecting Protein Low-Lying Conformational States
04:37

High-Pressure NMR Experiments for Detecting Protein Low-Lying Conformational States

Published on: June 29, 2021

3.2K
Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.1K
SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Social psychology
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Social conformity is well-documented in human-human interactions, driven by normative and informational motivations.
  • Factors influencing conformity include individual, group, contextual, and cultural elements.
  • Research has not yet explored whether nonhuman agents can induce social conformity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if nonhuman agents (computers, robots) elicit social conformity in human operators.
  • To examine how human-likeness of agents and task type affect conformity behavior.
  • To understand the interplay between agent characteristics, task demands, and human conformity.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were grouped with computers, robots, or humans.
  • Both social and analytical tasks were performed within these assigned groups.
  • Conformity rates were measured by the percentage of agreement with agent responses on critical trials.

Main Results:

  • A significant effect of task type on conformity was observed, with higher rates in analytical tasks compared to social tasks.
  • Conformity levels were modulated by the perceived fit between the agent and the task.
  • Participants showed comparable conformity to agents in analytical tasks but significantly higher conformity in social tasks as agent human-likeness increased.

Conclusions:

  • Nonhuman agents can indeed induce social conformity in humans.
  • The degree of conformity is influenced by the perceived alignment between the agent's nature and the task's requirements.
  • Human responses to nonhuman agent influence can vary significantly depending on the specific task domain.