Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

08:32
Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
Published on: January 3, 2017
23.2K
Neural Encoding of Attended Continuous Speech under Different Types of Interference
Andrea Olguin1, Tristan A Bekinschtein1, Mirjana Bozic1
1University of Cambridge.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|July 14, 2018
Summary
Selective attention to speech is flexible, with the brain processing attended and ignored information differently based on the interference type. Intelligible distractors lead to deeper processing and later separation of attended and unattended speech signals.
Area of Science:
- Auditory neuroscience
- Cognitive psychology
- Neuroscience of attention
Background:
- Auditory selective attention allows focus on relevant sounds amidst distractions.
- Understanding how attention modulates neural speech encoding is crucial for explaining auditory perception.
- Previous research suggests attention influences early sensory processing, but its role with complex distractors is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how attention modulates the neural encoding of continuous speech.
- To determine the impact of different interference types on speech processing.
- To examine the depth of neural processing for attended versus unattended speech signals.
Main Methods:
- Electroencephalography (EEG) experiment with participants attending to English speech.
- Four interference conditions: intelligible English, unintelligible Spanish, nonlinguistic (Musical Rain), and silence.
- Neural encoding assessed via cross-correlation of speech envelopes with EEG signals.
Main Results:
- Neural encoding was stronger for attended speech compared to ignored speech.
- Interference type significantly modulated neural encoding and signal dissociation.
- Intelligible English distractors resulted in stronger encoding and later dissociation, while unintelligible distractors caused weaker encoding and earlier dissociation.
Conclusions:
- Neural differentiation between attended and unattended speech depends on the nature of the competing sound.
- Selective attention's locus is flexible and influenced by distractor intelligibility.
- Findings support flexible accounts of auditory selective attention, suggesting variable processing depths.
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Diffraction
52.5K
Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
52.5K
RNA Interference
28.2K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
28.2K
Encoding
867
Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
867
Interference and Decay
477
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
477
Sound Waves: Interference
4.8K
Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
4.8K
Interference and Superposition of Waves
6.9K
When two waves of the same nature occur in the same region simultaneously, they result in interference. Interference of waves implies that the net effect of the waves is the sum of the individual waves' effects. However, it does not imply that the individual waves affect the propagation of other waves.
Interference occurs in mechanical waves, such as sound waves, waves on a string, and surface water waves. Mechanical waves correspond to the physical displacement of particles. Hence,...
Interference occurs in mechanical waves, such as sound waves, waves on a string, and surface water waves. Mechanical waves correspond to the physical displacement of particles. Hence,...
6.9K

