Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Evaluating inter-aural hearing preservation in bilateral paediatric cochlear implantation
Huw A S Jones1, Harry R F Powell1, Andy Hall1
1a The Royal National Throat, Nose & Ear Hospital , London , UK.
Insights
Bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in children shows variable hearing preservation between ears, even when controlling for known factors. This suggests other influences impact consistent results for hearing preservation.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Audiology
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) is a common procedure for pediatric hearing loss.
- Hearing preservation is a key outcome measure, but inter-aural consistency can vary.
- Understanding factors influencing hearing preservation is crucial for optimizing outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate inter-aural hearing preservation in children undergoing simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation.
- To identify consistency in hearing preservation outcomes between the two ears.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case review of 7 children who underwent simultaneous bilateral CI.
- Inclusion criteria: pre-operative hearing thresholds and no cochlear anomalies.
- Pre- and post-operative audiometry used to assess hearing preservation.
Main Results:
- Measurable hearing preservation was achieved in 86% of ears.
- Complete or partial hearing preservation occurred in 12 out of 14 ears.
- Significant inter-aural differences in hearing preservation were observed in 5 out of 7 patients, with a mean difference of 30.7%.
Conclusions:
- Simultaneous bilateral CI in children can result in variable inter-aural hearing preservation.
- Factors beyond surgical technique and known variables may influence hearing preservation consistency.
- Further research is needed to explore additional factors affecting bilateral CI outcomes.
Objective:
To examine inter-aural hearing preservation results in children undergoing simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation (CI).
Methods:
Retrospective case review in tertiary referral centre. All children undergoing simultaneous bilateral CI between January 2013 and June 2014 (18 months). Patients eligible for inclusion in the study had pre-operative hearing thresholds of <90 dB at 250 Hz and ≥100 dB at 500 Hz. Patients with anatomical cochlear anomalies or missing data were excluded. Seven patients were included, 1 male, 6 female, mean age of 12 years 11 months at the time of surgery. All patients had simultaneous bilateral cochlear implant surgery, using the same implant and technique. All patients had pre- and post-operative unaided pure tone audiometry. Inter-aural hearing preservation results were compared in each patient.
Results:
The achieved hearing preservation for 14 ears was complete in 5, partial in 7, and minimal in 2. Measurable hearing preservation was achieved in 86% overall. Inter-aural analysis revealed that only 2 (subjects 1 and 4) of the 7 patients had preservation results within the same preservation group (complete/partial/minimal). The mean inter-aural preservation difference was 30.7% with a range from 12.4% to 65.2%.
Conclusions:
Several factors and techniques have already been identified in the wider literature to explain differences in hearing preservation results in CI. However, despite controlling for known factors, we demonstrate variable inter-aural results. This suggests that there may be more factors beyond the surgeon's control influencing our ability to provide consistent results.
More Related Videos
03:49Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
Published on: October 11, 2024
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Hearing
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Evaluation
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation