Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Taxonomy01:31

Taxonomy

89.2K
Taxonomy is the science of defining and naming groups of biological organisms based on shared characteristics. It uses a hierarchy of increasingly inclusive categories with Latin names. The smallest units of taxonomy, species and genus, are used to assign a formal, taxonomic name to each species in a system. This classification system, referred to as binomial nomenclature, was formalized by Carolus Linnaeus in the 18th century.
Hierarchy of Taxonomy
The hierarchy that Carolus Linnaeus first...
89.2K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

33.6K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
33.6K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.9K
32.9K
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

695
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
695
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy01:20

Applications of Molecular Taxonomy

572
Molecular taxonomy has revolutionized the understanding and classification of bacteria, providing precise insights into their diversity, evolutionary relationships, and ecological roles. By utilizing molecular techniques such as DNA sequencing and fingerprinting, researchers have made significant strides in various fields related to bacterial studies.Resolving Taxonomic AmbiguitiesMolecular taxonomy has been instrumental in distinguishing closely related bacterial species initially thought to...
572
Machines01:19

Machines

581
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. One example of a machine is the cutting plier, which is used to cut wires by applying forces to its handles. When equal and opposite forces are exerted on the handles of the cutting plier, they cause the cutting edges to come together and apply equal and opposite reaction forces on the wire, which are greater than the applied forces.
A free-body diagram of the...
581

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

From Gene Copies to Cell Numbers: Advancing Quantitative Approaches in Protistan Ecology Using Digital PCR.

Molecular ecology resources·2026
Same author

Kaminari: a frugal colored index for approximate <i>k</i>-mer queries.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

Predicting sediment ecological state from metagenomes shows equal performance for taxonomic and functional features.

Marine environmental research·2026
Same author

Nematode metabarcoding as an alternative to conventional benthic macrofauna monitoring of fish farming.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same author

Protistan Plankton Responses to Variable Light and Upwelling in the Peruvian Humboldt Current System: Insights Into Community Dynamics Under Environmental Change.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Benchmarking beta-diversity measures and transfer functions for sedimentary ancient DNA.

ISME communications·2026
Same journal

EasyCen: A Lightweight Framework for Centromere Localisation and Repeat-Organisation Profiling in Telomere-to-Telomere Genomes.

Molecular ecology resources·2026
Same journal

A Practical Framework for GT-Seq Panel Optimization.

Molecular ecology resources·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Environmental DNA and Bulk DNA Metabarcoding for Assessing Terrestrial Arthropod Diversity Across Three Habitat Types on Guam.

Molecular ecology resources·2026
Same journal

pr2-Wormifier: A Bioinformatics Pipeline to Create Custom Reference Databases for Improved Metabarcoding of Marine Protists.

Molecular ecology resources·2026
Same journal

Individual Identification of Prey in Carnivore Scats.

Molecular ecology resources·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
09:16

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis

Published on: June 18, 2020

7.3K

Supervised machine learning outperforms taxonomy-based environmental DNA metabarcoding applied to biomonitoring.

Tristan Cordier1, Dominik Forster2, Yoann Dufresne1,3

  • 1Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Molecular Ecology Resources
|July 18, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Supervised machine learning accurately predicts environmental impact from DNA data, regardless of marker type. This approach surpasses traditional DNA identification methods for biodiversity monitoring.

Keywords:
biomonitoringbiotic indicesenvironmental DNApredictive modelssupervised machine learning

More Related Videos

Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning
12:06

Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning

Published on: March 3, 2023

4.8K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
09:16

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis

Published on: June 18, 2020

7.3K
Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning
12:06

Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning

Published on: March 3, 2023

4.8K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioassessment

Background:

  • Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers advantages over traditional biodiversity monitoring.
  • Supervised machine learning (SML) can predict biotic indices from eDNA data without taxonomic identification.
  • The influence of marker taxonomic resolution and comparison with bioindicator species-based methods remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate how taxonomic resolution of molecular markers affects SML model accuracy for eDNA bioassessment.
  • To compare SML performance using different markers against taxonomy-based metabarcoding.
  • To assess the environmental impact of marine aquaculture using SML and various markers.

Main Methods:

  • Trained predictive models using five different ribosomal bacterial and eukaryotic markers.
  • Applied models to independent datasets for assessing marine aquaculture's environmental impact.
  • Compared model performance across markers and against taxonomy-assigned sequence assessments.

Main Results:

  • All tested markers yielded accurate predictive models for environmental impact assessment.
  • SML models consistently outperformed assessments based solely on taxonomically assigned sequences.
  • No significant performance difference was observed between universal eukaryotic and prokaryotic markers.

Conclusions:

  • SML with eDNA metabarcoding provides accurate bioassessment regardless of marker's taxonomic resolution.
  • The SML approach overcomes limitations inherent in taxonomy-based eDNA bioassessment.
  • This method enhances environmental impact assessment for anthropogenic activities.