Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retrieval practice versus generating mnemonics: Implications for study strategy use in chemistry.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

The "curse of knowledge" when predicting others' knowledge.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same author

Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues.

Memory & cognition·2021
Same author

What characteristics make self-generated memory cues effective over time?

Memory (Hove, England)·2021
Same author

Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same author

Generating mnemonics boosts recall of chemistry information.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2021
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Predicting others' knowledge: Knowledge estimation as cue utilization.

Jonathan G Tullis1

  • 1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona, 1430 E. Second St., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. tullis@email.arizona.edu.

Memory & Cognition
|July 19, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating others' knowledge is crucial for social and educational success. This study shows that people use various metacognitive cues, not just their own knowledge, to judge what others know, with cue weighting influenced by context.

Keywords:
MetacognitionMonitoringPerspective taking

More Related Videos

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task
07:08

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task

Published on: December 5, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task
07:08

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task

Published on: December 5, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Cognition
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of others' knowledge is vital for social and educational interactions.
  • Teachers' ability to gauge student knowledge is a key factor in effective teaching.
  • Existing research often assumes knowledge estimation is directly based on self-knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and test the knowledge estimation as cue-utilization framework.
  • To investigate whether individuals automatically use their own knowledge to estimate others' knowledge.
  • To examine how judgment conditions influence cue weighting and how diagnosticity affects cue utilization.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to test hypotheses derived from the cue-utilization framework.
  • Participants' metacognitive judgments of others' knowledge were analyzed.
  • The study examined the cues utilized and their diagnosticity in predicting others' knowledge.

Main Results:

  • Estimates of others' knowledge were not automatically grounded in participants' own knowledge.
  • Judgment conditions significantly altered the weighting of different metacognitive cues.
  • Participants differentially weighted cues based on their diagnosticity for estimating others' knowledge.

Conclusions:

  • Metacognitive judgments of others' knowledge are dynamically generated through cue utilization.
  • The process is sensitive to contextual factors, similar to self-knowledge monitoring.
  • Understanding cue utilization provides insights into social and educational prediction accuracy.