Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Sigma's Non-specific Protease Activity Assay - Casein as a Substrate
Published on: September 17, 2008
Expected long-term defect rate of analytical performance in the medical laboratory: Assured Sigma versus observed
1Immunogenetics Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Abstract:
Reliability of laboratory results is determined by the ratio of incorrect results expected in long-term. Sigma is a measure of defect ratio, therefore long-term Sigma is a measure of the reliability of laboratory results. Commonly, long-term Sigma is estimated based on the short-term Sigma. The Six Sigma methodology assumes that in long-term performances will shift up to 1.5 Sigma, and therefore the long-term Sigma is considered 1.5 Sigma less than short-term Sigma. Analytical performance in the medical laboratory is prone to shifts larger than 1.5 Sigma. Thus, the 1.5 Sigma shift assumed in the Six Sigma is not a correct estimate in the medical laboratory. On the other hand, in the medical laboratory statistical quality control procedure (SQC) is applied to detect and correct shifts. Since SQC can be planned to trap shifts of different sizes, the threshold set for SQC determines the defect rate expected for long-term.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Value
Quality Assurance
Naturalistic Observations
Reaction Rate
The mathematical representation of the change in the concentration of reactants and products, over time, is the rate...
Determination of Expected Frequency
Lumber Defects
Shakes are minor fractures that run along or across the wood's annual rings, while wane is...

