Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

04:33
Primary Culture of Rat Adrenocortical Cells and Assays of Steroidogenic Functions
Published on: March 12, 2019
8.5K
Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasm: A systematic review
John J Kanitra1, John C Hardaway2, Tahereh Soleimani3
1Department of Surgery, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI.
Surgery
|July 25, 2018
Summary
Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms are often malignant or have malignant potential, contrary to prior beliefs. The Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia criteria aid in identifying patients needing closer surveillance for better prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Oncology
- Pathology
Background:
- Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms are rare, typically considered benign and nonfunctional.
- Existing literature is primarily based on single-case reports, necessitating a comprehensive review.
Observation:
- A systematic review analyzed 140 adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms from 84 citations.
- The majority occurred in females (66%), on the left side (64%), and were nonfunctional (66%).
- Median tumor size was 80 mm, with a mean age at diagnosis of 44 years.
Findings:
- 35% were benign, 41% borderline, and 24% malignant.
- Malignant tumors were more common in males (36% vs. 18%).
- 5-year survival rates were 100% for benign, 88% for borderline, and 47% for malignant neoplasms.
- Synaptophysin positivity and vimentin negativity correlated with benignancy.
Implications:
- Contrary to previous literature, 65% of these neoplasms showed malignancy or malignant potential.
- The Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia criteria are crucial for identifying high-risk patients.
- Prognosis is significantly influenced by the Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia classification, guiding surveillance strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview
11.5K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.5K
Random and Systematic Errors
15.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.1K
Systematic Sampling Method
13.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K

