Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.4K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.4K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K
Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

16.8K
Proteins can form homomeric complexes with another unit of the same protein or heteromeric complexes with different types.  Most protein complexes self-assemble spontaneously via ordered pathways, while some proteins need assembly factors that guide their proper assembly. Despite the crowded intracellular environment, proteins usually interact with their correct partners and form functional complexes.
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
16.8K
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

2.9K
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Standardized Classification System for Dysphotopsia Reporting.

Ophthalmology. Glaucoma·2026
Same author

Understanding pre-training data effects in retinal foundation models using two large fundus cohorts.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Augmenting a prognostic deep learning system for referable diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy with synthetic retinal images.

Communications medicine·2025
Same author

Using retinal diagnostics as a biomarker for neurodegenerative diseases: protocol for a systematic review.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Real-World Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: What Is the Current Status?

Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Building the world's first truly global medical foundation model.

Nature medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
05:19

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.7K

Updated cataract surgery complexity stratification score for trainee ophthalmic surgeons.

Paul Nderitu1, Paul Ursell1

  • 1From Epsom and St. Helier University National Health Service Trust, Sutton, London, United Kingdom.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|July 26, 2018
PubMed
Summary

A new cataract surgery complexity score helps match trainee experience to case difficulty, improving patient safety and outcomes. Higher scores indicate increased risk of complications and lower visual acuity.

More Related Videos

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
10:29

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon

Published on: January 6, 2011

117.4K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
04:59

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation

Published on: July 7, 2023

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
05:19

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.7K
Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
10:29

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon

Published on: January 6, 2011

117.4K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
04:59

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation

Published on: July 7, 2023

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Education
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Cataract surgery is a common procedure with varying complexity.
  • Training surgeons requires careful case selection to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes.
  • Existing methods for assessing surgical complexity may not adequately stratify risk for trainees.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comprehensive cataract surgery complexity score system.
  • To utilize evidence-based risk factors for posterior capsule rupture and patient-specific factors.
  • To stratify complexity and guide appropriate case selection for surgical trainees.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of primary phacoemulsification cataract surgeries.
  • Inclusion of 11,468 cases from January 2011 to December 2016.
  • Exclusion of combined procedures; data extraction on demographics, pupil size, complications, and visual acuity.

Main Results:

  • A complexity score was assigned to 8200 (71.5%) cases.
  • Factors associated with increased complexity included small pupil, pupil expander use, iris damage, zonular dialysis, elevated intraocular pressure, and corneal edema.
  • Appropriate case allocation by complexity and surgeon grade eliminated the association between posterior capsule rupture and complexity score.

Conclusions:

  • The developed cataract complexity score system effectively stratifies surgical case difficulty.
  • Higher complexity scores correlate with increased intraoperative and postoperative complications.
  • The score aids in matching trainee experience to case complexity, enhancing patient safety and outcomes.