Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
Published on: May 31, 2021
[Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: A diagnosis to evoke]
Lucy Di Marco1, Kevin Pujo2, Damien Molly3
1Radiologie neuro-ORL et ostéo-articulaire, hôpital Edouard-Herriot, pavillon B, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69437 Lyon cedex 03, France.
Abstract:
Among fungal infections of the nasal sinuses, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis is a recently described, relatively rare and little known pathology. Its diagnosis is based on: clinical criteria (it occurs in young immunocompetent patients, often associated with bilateral nasosinusal polyposis); pathological criteria (allergic mucin: eosinophilic mucus without invasion of the sinusal mucosa and observation of fungal hyphae on surgical samples); biological criteria (hypereosinophilia, total and specific antifungal IgE); and radiological criteria. The combination of tomodensitometry (heterogeneous hyperdense and diffuse filling of nasosinusal cavities with expanded borders and a distended appearance of the bony wall), and MRI scan (extensive character and lesional signal [hypo and asignal T1 and T2], and cerebriform aspect of the fungal process) strongly suggests the diagnosis. It is important to distinguish the most typical forms, as well as unusual forms of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Main differential diagnoses are represented by other forms of fungal nasosinusal infections with different treatment and prognosis.
Insights
Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis is a rare fungal infection diagnosed using clinical, pathological, biological, and radiological criteria. Early diagnosis and differentiation from other fungal infections are crucial for appropriate treatment and prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Mycology
- Immunology
Background:
- Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a distinct fungal infection of the nasal sinuses.
- It is characterized by an allergic response to fungi in immunocompetent individuals, often presenting with nasal polyposis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the diagnostic criteria for allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.
- To emphasize the importance of differentiating AFRS from other fungal sinonasal infections.
Main Methods:
- Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, pathological, biological, and radiological findings.
- Clinical criteria include presentation in young, immunocompetent patients with bilateral nasosinusal polyposis.
- Pathological criteria involve allergic mucin with fungal hyphae and eosinophilic mucus without tissue invasion.
- Biological criteria include hypereosinophilia and specific antifungal IgE.
- Radiological assessment utilizes CT (tomodensitometry) and MRI to identify characteristic sinonasal cavity changes.
Main Results:
- Diagnostic criteria encompass clinical presentation, pathological findings (allergic mucin, fungal hyphae), biological markers (hypereosinophilia, IgE), and specific radiological features.
- CT scans show heterogeneous hyperdense filling with expanded bony walls.
- MRI reveals extensive lesions with characteristic signal intensities (hypo- and as-signal T1/T2) and a cerebriform appearance.
Conclusions:
- Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis requires a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach.
- Accurate differentiation from other fungal sinonasal infections is essential due to differing prognoses and treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Allergic Drug Reactions
Fungal Group Zygomycota
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Fungal Phylum Ascomycota

