Surgery for Abdominal Tuberculosis in the Present Era: Experience from a Tertiary-Care Center

The role of surgery in abdominal tuberculosis is being redefined, as many patients will be candidates for endoscopic dilatation rather than open surgery.

A retrospective analysis was done of the surgical procedures performed in patients with abdominal tuberculosis in a large tertiary-care center in North India. Details such as clinical presentations, previous history of tuberculosis, any anti-tubercular therapy (ATT), Mantoux skin test results, and the surgical procedures and findings were recorded. Short-term outcomes also were analyzed.

Thirty-five patients (26 male) were included, and the median age at presentation was 24 years (range 12-80 years). Sixteen patients had received prior ATT for abdominal tuberculosis. The indication for surgery was intestinal obstruction, perforation, and bleeding in 23 (66%), 10 (29%), and 2 (6%) respectively. Twenty-eight patients had intestinal strictures, with the ileum being the most common site (n = 21). Perforation was present in 10 patients, of which six had multiple perforations. Cocoon abdomen was present in four patients, two of whom had associated small-bowel stricture. Among 33 patients who underwent bowel resection, 14 had ileo-cecal resection/right hemicolectomy. The rest had small-bowel resection. Primary anastomosis and stoma creation was performed in 12 (36%) and 21 (64%), respectively. Post-operative intra-abdominal collections (p = 0.02) and incision dehiscence (p = 0.05) were more common in patients having stoma creation.

Surgical intervention is warranted in a subset of patients with abdominal tuberculosis and may be required in patients with recurrent intestinal obstruction or pain, intestinal perforation, or gastrointestinal bleeding.