Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Screening of Tobacco Genotypes for Phytophthora nicotianae Resistance
Published on: April 15, 2022
Billing Practices Among US Tobacco Use Treatment Providers
Erika Litvin Bloom1, Michael V Burke, Chris Kotsen
1Alpert Medical School of Brown University (ELB); Rhode Island Hospital (ELB, LEH); Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Nicotine Dependence Center (MVB); Steeplechase Cancer Center at Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health University Hospital Somerset (CK); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine (AOG, CR-M); Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School (MBS); Florida State University College of Medicine Tobacco Program (MD); Fire Department of the City of New York Tobacco Treatment Program, IQuit Smoking at Jersey City Medical Center RWJ Barnabas (MPB); Business Practices Committee of the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence (ATTUD) (ELB, MVB, CK, AOG, CR-M, MBS, MD, MPB).
Objectives:
The US Affordable Care Act (ACA) now requires almost all health insurance plans to cover tobacco use treatment (TUT), but TUT remains underutilized.
Methods:
We conducted an anonymous online survey of US TUT providers in 2016 regarding their billing practices.
Results:
Participants (n = 131) provided services primarily in medical and behavioral health settings and were from a variety of professions. Most provided intensive individual (>15 minutes per session) and/or group counseling. Although most reported that their organization accepted at least 1 form of insurance, only 34% reported that TUT services were billed, with about equal proportions endorsing billing under their own independent tax ID and "incident to" billing under a supervisor. Half of billers (52%) reported using at least 1 Current Procedural Terminology code. The most common codes were 99406 and 99407, but 18 unique codes were specified. Themes of qualitative responses (n = 101) included concern about how to initiate and sustain adequate reimbursement, and experiences with billing not being "worth" the time or effort.
Conclusions:
Overall, results demonstrate a need for providers, administrators, and billing managers to work collaboratively. Even with the ACA mandate, and consistent with prior reports, reimbursement rates may be inadequate for intensive counseling. Areas for advocacy include recognizing that TUT requires similar intensity, expertise, and reimbursement as other substance use disorders and chronic medical conditions; giving Tobacco Treatment Specialists the ability to bill independently; and improving coordination between intensive therapies validated in research and "real-world" logistics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Characteristics of Practical Op Amps
The ratio of differential gain to the common-mode gain is defined as the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). This ratio quantifies the ability of operational amplifiers (op-amps) to reject common-mode...
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Equivalent Circuits for Practical Transformers
In a practical transformer, each winding exhibits resistance and leakage reactance. The...
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...

