Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Selecting lung cancer screenees using risk prediction models-where do we go from here
1Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, Walker Complex - Academic South, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can be improved by using risk models instead of current criteria. This approach identifies more high-risk individuals for lung cancer screening, enhancing effectiveness and cost-efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology
- Oncology
- Radiology
Background:
- National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% in high-risk individuals.
- Current lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (e.g., USPSTF, CMS) are based on age, smoking history, and pack-years.
- Model-estimated risk selection for lung cancer screening shows promise over traditional criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the superiority of model-estimated risk over NLST-like criteria for lung cancer screening selection.
- To assess the impact of excluding low-risk individuals from screening on cohort characteristics.
- To consider the role of race and ethnicity in model-based lung cancer screening eligibility.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of retrospective data and ongoing prospective trials (ILST, Lung Cancer Screening Pilot for People at High Risk).
- Comparison of screening selection using model-based risk (e.g., PLCOm2012) versus NLST-like criteria.
- Evaluation of lung cancer incidence, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and cost-effectiveness.
Main Results:
- Model-based risk selection demonstrates higher sensitivity, PPV, more averted deaths, and better cost-effectiveness than NLST-like criteria.
- Excluding 25.6% of NLST-eligible smokers at low risk results in a screening group with similar age, comorbidity, and competing mortality risks to the PLCOm2012+ve group.
- Interim results from ILST and the Cancer Care Ontario pilot support the risk-based approach to lung cancer screening.
Conclusions:
- Risk-based selection models are superior to current criteria for identifying individuals who benefit from lung cancer screening.
- Excluding low-risk individuals from screening improves the characteristics of the screened population.
- Future lung cancer screening programs should consider incorporating risk models, potentially adjusting for racial and ethnic disparities.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Relative Risk
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Lung Capacity
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...

