Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

11:13
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
14.5K
Pettiness in social exchange.
Tami Kim1, Ting Zhang2, Michael I Norton2
1Darden School of Business.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|July 31, 2018
Summary
Focusing on trivial details in exchanges, known as pettiness, can harm relationships. Even generous exchanges feel transactional when attention is paid to minor details, signaling a lack of communal sharing.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Pettiness, or excessive focus on trivial details in exchanges, is a novel construct.
- Understanding its impact on interpersonal dynamics and social exchange is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and document the construct of pettiness.
- To examine the negative implications of pettiness in interpersonal relationships and social exchange across cultures.
Main Methods:
- Seven empirical studies were conducted.
- Research involved examining exchanges of money and time across diverse cultural contexts (US, Switzerland, Germany, Austria).
Main Results:
- Pettiness is distinct from related constructs like generosity and conscientiousness.
- People perceive petty exchanges negatively, even when objectively more generous.
- Pettiness signals relationship issues more strongly than the actual benefit exchanged.
Conclusions:
- Attentiveness to trivial details in resource exchanges damages communal-sharing relationships.
- Pettiness makes exchanges feel transactional, undermining relationship quality.
- Individuals should consider both the quantity and manner of resource exchange to maintain healthy relationships.
Related Concept Videos
Social Exchange Theory
40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
Social Exchange Theory
481
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
481
Social Proof
32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Social Scripts
10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Social Traps
26.9K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Facilitation
36.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K

