Negative trials in critical care: why most research is probably wrong
John G Laffey1, Brian P Kavanagh2
1Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI) at the Centre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM), Biomedical Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; Department of Anaesthesia, Department of Physiology, and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
No abstract available in PubMed .
More Related Videos
05:51Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Diaphragm Function and Patient Outcomes
Published on: November 3, 2023
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Critical Values
Critical Thinking I
