Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

11:09
Deep Brain Stimulation with Simultaneous fMRI in Rodents
Published on: February 15, 2014
14.6K
Improved accuracy using a modified registration method of ROSA in deep brain stimulation surgery
Neurosurgical Focus
|August 2, 2018
Summary
A modified registration method significantly reduced errors in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery using the ROSA system. While clinical outcomes showed no significant difference, the improved accuracy in DBS surgery is promising.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Medical Robotics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a crucial treatment for movement disorders.
- Accurate electrode placement is vital for DBS efficacy and safety.
- Registration errors can impact surgical precision and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a modified registration method for reducing errors in DBS surgery.
- To assess the clinical significance of this modified method using the ROSA system.
- To analyze the correlation between registration error and electrode vector error.
Main Methods:
- Skull models and clinical trials were used to test registration methods with the ROSA system.
- Conventional and modified registration techniques were compared in 33 (group I) and 38 (group II) patients.
- Registration error, electrode vector error, intraoperative electrophysiological signal length (IESL), and DBS power-on voltage were measured.
Main Results:
- The modified registration method significantly reduced registration error (0.27 ± 0.07 mm vs. 0.62 ± 0.22 mm) and electrode vector error (0.65 ± 0.23 mm vs. 0.97 ± 0.31 mm).
- A positive correlation was observed between registration error and electrode vector error in both groups.
- The modified method also led to a significant reduction in DBS power-on voltage (1.48 ± 0.38 V vs. 1.63 ± 0.44 V).
Conclusions:
- The modified registration method effectively decreases registration and electrode vector errors in ROSA-assisted DBS surgery.
- While short-term clinical outcomes (UPDRS scores) were similar, the reduction in surgical errors is a key advancement.
- Further long-term evaluation is necessary to fully understand the clinical impact of the modified registration technique.
Keywords:
DBS = deep brain stimulationIESL = intraoperative electrophysiological signal lengthROSASTN = subthalamic nucleusUPDRS = Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating ScaleUPDRS-III = UPDRS Part IIIdeep brain stimulationelectrode vector errormodified registrationregistration errorMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
15.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.0K
Improving Translational Accuracy
3.7K
3.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
102.4K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
102.4K
Accuracy and Precision
15.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...
15.5K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
1.3K
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
1.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
599
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
599

