Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

53.1K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
53.1K
Measures of Central Tendency02:16

Measures of Central Tendency

21.3K
The "center" of a data set is also a way of describing location. The two most widely used measures of the "center" of the data are the mean (average) and the median. The words "mean" and "average" are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is "arithmetic mean" and "average" is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians,...
21.3K
Measurement: Standard Units03:38

Measurement: Standard Units

80.9K
Every measurement provides three kinds of information: the size or magnitude of the measurement (a number), a standard of comparison for the measurement (a unit), and an indication of the uncertainty of the measurement. While the number and unit are explicitly represented when a quantity is written, the uncertainty is an aspect of the errors in the measurement results.
80.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

83.3K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
83.3K
Measuring Reaction Rates03:09

Measuring Reaction Rates

30.2K
Polarimetry finds application in chemical kinetics to measure the concentration and reaction kinetics of optically active substances during a chemical reaction. Optically active substances have the capability of rotating the plane of polarization of linearly polarized light passing through them—a feature called optical rotation. Optical activity is attributed to the molecular structure of substances. Normal monochromatic light is unpolarized and possesses oscillations of the electrical...
30.2K
Measurement: Derived Units03:02

Measurement: Derived Units

55.7K
The International System of Units or SI system, by international agreement, has fixed measurement units for seven fundamental properties: length, mass, time, temperature, electric current, amount of substance, and luminosity. These are called the SI base units.
55.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation-Based Assessments in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Scoping Review.

JBJS reviews·2026
Same author

Re: Navid Roessler, Marcin Miszczyk, Keiichiro Miyajima, et al. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction in Urologic Cancers: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2025; S2405-4569(25)00362-1. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.007.

European urology focus·2026
Same author

European Expert Consensus on Essential Variables for Teledermatological Assessment of Skin Tumours.

Acta dermato-venereologica·2026
Same author

ERS/ESGE/ESTS clinical practice guidelines on endobronchial and oesophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer.

The European respiratory journal·2026
Same author

AIBAN-AI Bronchial Detection and Airway Navigation System.

Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology·2026
Same author

Examining the Validity of the Implementation Quality Rubric for Simulation (IQR-SIM) for Assessing Implementation Quality of Simulation-based Programs.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
Same journal

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Financial support scheme following a recognised occupational injury].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Foreign body granulomas in the lungs after several years of parenteral nutrition].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Vaginal aids for stress incontinence].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Osteodystrophy in chronic liver disease].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
Same journal

[Tympanic membrane perforation].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K

[Measuring doctors competencies].

Ebbe Thinggaard1, Ann Sofia Thomsen, Lotte O'Nelli

  • 1ebbe.thinggaard@gmail.com.

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|August 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explains how to systematically explore validity evidence for assessment tools in medical education. Ensuring validity supports fair and accurate competency evaluation.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Assessment Science

Background:

  • Competency-based medical education (CBME) requires robust assessment tools.
  • Validity evidence is crucial for ensuring assessment tools accurately measure intended competencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a contemporary approach to validity evidence using Kane's framework.
  • To illustrate the systematic exploration of validity evidence with a practical example.

Main Methods:

  • Review of contemporary validity frameworks.
  • Application of Kane's framework to assessment tools.
  • Systematic exploration of validity evidence.

Main Results:

  • Kane's framework offers a structured approach to validity evidence.
  • Systematic exploration ensures assessments are fair and just.
  • The example demonstrates practical application of validity evidence.

Conclusions:

  • A systematic approach to validity evidence is essential in CBME.
  • Kane's framework provides a robust model for validity argument development.
  • Ensuring assessment validity supports defensible decisions in medical education.