Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishing an Accurate Microhardness Testing Protocol for Craniofacial Tissues
Published on: April 26, 2024
Effect of Root Repair Materials and Bioactive Glasses on Microhardness of Dentin
Olinto Santos Cardoso1,2, Meire Coelho Ferreira1, Edilausson Moreno Carvalho2
1School of Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil.
Introduction:
The use of bioactive glasses to re-establish or increase mechanical properties of the root dentin may be an interesting alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of root repair materials and bioactive glasses on the microhardness of human root dentin.
Methods And Materials:
Sixty-four sectioned palatal roots of human molars were prepared and two slices were obtained of the middle third of each root (one corresponding to the control group, without treatment, and the other to the experimental group). The pairs of slices were randomly divided into four groups (n=16). The root canal of experimental slices were filled with one of the following materials: mineral trioxide aggregate (Angelus MTA, Angelus, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil), EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM, Brassler, Savannah, GA, USA), Bioglass (45S5) and an experimental niobophosphate glass (NbG). The specimens were stored in an oven at 37ºC, in an environment with 100% humidity for 60 days. The specimens were subjected to a microhardness test. Four indentations were made at a distance of 20 µm from the root canal lumen. For microhardness analysis, comparing the experimental groups and their respective controls, the Student's-t test was applied. For comparison of the percentage increase in microhardness between the groups, the data were statistically analyzed by using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. The level of significance was set at 0.05.
Results:
All the materials significantly increased the dentin microhardness values (P<0.05). MTA showed a higher increase in microhardness (94.8±42.7%), similar to that of EndoSequence (62.3±39.9%). The 45S5 (46.5±30.0%) and NbG (53.8±31.3%) showed the lowest percentages of increase in microhardness, but were statistically similar to those of EndoSequence.
Conclusion:
All the materials tested were capable of increasing root dentin microhardness.
More Related Videos
06:33Author Spotlight: Exploring Plant-Microbe Interactions Through Root Exudates in a Novel Growth System
Published on: November 17, 2023
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Looking Glass Self
Mismatch Repair
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Long-patch Base Excision Repair