Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Comparative performance assessment of beam hardening correction algorithms applied on simulated data sets
1X-Tek Systems Ltd (Nikon Metrology UK Ltd), Unit 5, Icknield Industrial Estate, Tring, U.K.
This study compares four beam hardening correction algorithms for industrial computed tomography (CT). The dual-energy method effectively eliminates artefacts and improves dimensional accuracy, while iterative methods reduce streaks but can introduce aliasing.
Area of Science:
- Industrial Imaging
- Image Processing
- Metrology
Background:
- Industrial computed tomography (CT) is crucial for non-destructive testing but suffers from image quality degradation due to beam hardening artefacts.
- Beam hardening artefacts, appearing as cupping or streaks, impair image fidelity and dimensional accuracy in CT reconstructions.
- Existing correction algorithms, primarily developed for medical CT, require evaluation for their effectiveness in industrial CT applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of four distinct beam hardening correction algorithms in industrial CT metrology.
- To assess algorithms based on image quality, artefact reduction, and dimensional measurement accuracy.
- To provide insights for selecting appropriate algorithms based on specific industrial needs.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of four algorithm types: single-material linearization, multi-material linearization, dual-energy, and iterative reconstruction.
- Application of algorithms to simulated dual-material phantom data under ideal and noisy conditions.
- Quantitative assessment using contrast-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution, artefact reduction, and dimensional measurement deviations.
Main Results:
- Single-material linearization partially reduces artefacts; multi-material linearization improves dimensional accuracy.
- Dual-energy methods eliminate artefacts and enhance low-contrast visibility and dimensional accuracy.
- Iterative algorithms reduce streaks but can cause aliasing, with performance dependent on computational power; noise degrades image quality.
Conclusions:
- The dual-energy method offers the most comprehensive solution for beam hardening correction in industrial CT metrology.
- Iterative methods are effective for streak reduction but require careful consideration of computational cost and potential aliasing.
- Algorithm selection should be tailored to specific industrial requirements for image quality, artefact control, and measurement precision.
More Related Videos
04:35Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment
Published on: July 5, 2024
06:18Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design
Published on: December 3, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Setting a Curve Using Design Data
Performing a Simple Data Analysis using MS-Excel Function
SUM: This function calculates the total sum of a range of values. It's the foundation for aggregating data, essential for determining overall trends and totals in datasets.
AVERAGE: It computes the mean value of a given set of numbers, providing a quick insight into the central...
Distance Corrections
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Beams
Based on geometry, beams can be straight, tapered, or curved. Straight beams are the most common type and have a constant cross-section throughout their length. Tapered beams, on the other hand, have a varying cross-section along...